Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;29(4):181-186.
doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000247.

Practical Considerations for Radiologists in Implementing a Patient-friendly MRI Experience

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Practical Considerations for Radiologists in Implementing a Patient-friendly MRI Experience

Murat Alp Oztek et al. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

For many patients, numerous unpleasant features of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experience such as scan duration, auditory noise, spatial confinement, and motion restrictions can lead to premature termination or low diagnostic quality of imaging studies. This article discusses practical, patient-oriented considerations that are helpful for radiologists contemplating ways to improve the MRI experience for patients. Patient friendly scanner properties are discussed, with an emphasis on literature findings of effectiveness in mitigating patient claustrophobia, other anxiety, or motion and on reducing scan incompletion rates or need for sedation. As shorter scanning protocols designed to answer specific diagnostic questions may be more practical and tolerable to the patient than a full-length standard-of-care examination, a few select protocol adjustments potentially useful for specific clinical settings are discussed. In addition, adjunctive devices such as audiovisual or other sensory aides that can be useful distractive approaches to reduce patient discomfort are considered. These modifications to the MRI scanning process not only allow for a more pleasant experience for patients, but they may also increase patient compliance and decrease patient movement to allow more efficient acquisition of diagnostic-quality images.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Price DL, De Wilde JP, Papadaki AM, et al. Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:288–293.
    1. Radomskij P, Schmidt MA, Heron CW, et al. Effect of MRI noise on cochlear function. Lancet 2002; 359:1485.
    1. Hattori Y, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T. Measurement and evaluation of the acoustic noise of a 3 Tesla MR scanner. Nagoya J Med Sci 2007; 69:23–28.
    1. Münzel T, Schmidt FP, Steven S, et al. Environmental noise and the cardiovascular system. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71:688–697.
    1. Oztek MA, Noda S, Beauchemin EA, et al. Gentle touch: noninvasive approaches to improve patient comfort and cooperation for pediatric imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 29:187–195.