Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32514597
- PMCID: PMC7334257
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06126-y
Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of dysphagia interventions compared to standard care in improving oral intake and reducing aspiration for adults in acute and critical care.
Methods: We searched electronic literature for randomised and quasi-randomised trials and bibliography lists of included studies to March 2020. Study screening, data extraction, risk of bias and quality assessments were conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis used fixed effects modelling. The systematic review protocol is registered and published.
Results: We identified 22 studies (19 stroke, 2 intensive care stroke and 1 general intensive care) testing 9 interventions and representing 1700 patients. Swallowing treatment showed no evidence of a difference in the time to return to oral intake (n = 33, MD (days) - 4.5, 95% CI - 10.6 to 1.6, 1 study, P = 0.15) (very low certainty) or in aspiration following treatment (n = 113, RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.45, 4 studies, I2 = 0%, P = 0.45) (low certainty). Swallowing treatment showed evidence of a reduced risk of pneumonia (n = 719, RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89, 8 studies, I2 = 15%, P = 0.004) (low certainty) but no evidence of a difference in swallowing quality of life scores (n = 239, MD - 11.38, 95% CI - 23.83 to 1.08, I 2 = 78%, P = 0.07) (very low certainty).
Conclusion: There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of swallowing treatments in the acute and critical care setting. Clinical trials consistently measuring patient-centred outcomes are needed.
Keywords: Critical care; Deglutition disorders; Dysphagia; Dysphagia rehabilitation; Intensive care; Swallowing therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Dysphagia in critical care: focus on therapeutical interventions.Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1972-1973. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06189-x. Epub 2020 Jul 21. Intensive Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32696191 No abstract available.
-
Swallowing therapy compared to standard care may not have had a beneficial effect on the incidence of pneumonia for patients in acute care.Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;47(6):716-717. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06337-3. Epub 2021 Feb 8. Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33555360 No abstract available.
-
Swallowing therapy compared to standard care may not have had a beneficial effect on the incidence of pneumonia for patients in acute care. Author's reply.Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;47(6):718-719. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06381-7. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Intensive Care Med. 2021. PMID: 33847770 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Power M, Singh KD, Nicolson DA. Recovery of swallowing after dysphagic stroke relates to functional reorganization in the intact motor cortex. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(5):1104–1112. - PubMed
-
- Macht M, Wimbish T, Bodine C. ICU-acquired swallowing disorders. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2396–2405. - PubMed
-
- Skoretz S, Yau TM, Ivanov J, Granton JT, Martino R. Dysphagia and associated risk factors following extubation in cardiovascular surgical patients. Dysphagia. 2014;6:647–654. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources