Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jul;46(7):1326-1338.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06126-y. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in acute and critical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sallyanne Duncan et al. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of dysphagia interventions compared to standard care in improving oral intake and reducing aspiration for adults in acute and critical care.

Methods: We searched electronic literature for randomised and quasi-randomised trials and bibliography lists of included studies to March 2020. Study screening, data extraction, risk of bias and quality assessments were conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analysis used fixed effects modelling. The systematic review protocol is registered and published.

Results: We identified 22 studies (19 stroke, 2 intensive care stroke and 1 general intensive care) testing 9 interventions and representing 1700 patients. Swallowing treatment showed no evidence of a difference in the time to return to oral intake (n = 33, MD (days) - 4.5, 95% CI - 10.6 to 1.6, 1 study, P = 0.15) (very low certainty) or in aspiration following treatment (n = 113, RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.45, 4 studies, I2 = 0%, P = 0.45) (low certainty). Swallowing treatment showed evidence of a reduced risk of pneumonia (n = 719, RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.89, 8 studies, I2 = 15%, P = 0.004) (low certainty) but no evidence of a difference in swallowing quality of life scores (n = 239, MD - 11.38, 95% CI - 23.83 to 1.08, I 2 = 78%, P = 0.07) (very low certainty).

Conclusion: There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of swallowing treatments in the acute and critical care setting. Clinical trials consistently measuring patient-centred outcomes are needed.

Keywords: Critical care; Deglutition disorders; Dysphagia; Dysphagia rehabilitation; Intensive care; Swallowing therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1:
PRISMA flowchart
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2:
Swallowing therapy versus standard care: aspiration incidence post-intervention
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3:
Swallowing therapy versus standard care: incidence of pneumonia

Comment in

References

    1. Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Power M, Singh KD, Nicolson DA. Recovery of swallowing after dysphagic stroke relates to functional reorganization in the intact motor cortex. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(5):1104–1112. - PubMed
    1. Zuercher P, Moret CS, Dziewas R, Schefold JC. Dysphagia in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, mechanisms and clinical management. Crit Care. 2019;23:103–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macht M, Wimbish T, Bodine C. ICU-acquired swallowing disorders. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(10):2396–2405. - PubMed
    1. Barker J, Martino R, Reichardt B, Hickey EJ, Ralph-Edwards A. Incidence and impact of dysphagia in patients receiving prolonged endotracheal intubation after cardiac surgery. Can J Surg. 2009;52:119–124. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skoretz S, Yau TM, Ivanov J, Granton JT, Martino R. Dysphagia and associated risk factors following extubation in cardiovascular surgical patients. Dysphagia. 2014;6:647–654. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources