Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2290-2300.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6504.

Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Brooke Levis  1   2 Ying Sun  1 Chen He  1 Yin Wu  1   2   3 Ankur Krishnan  1 Parash Mani Bhandari  1   2 Dipika Neupane  1   2 Mahrukh Imran  1 Eliana Brehaut  1 Zelalem Negeri  1   2 Felix H Fischer  4 Andrea Benedetti  2   5   6 Brett D Thombs  1   2   3   5   7   8 Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ CollaborationLiying CheAlexander LevisKira RiehmNazanin SaadatMarleine AzarDanielle RiceJill BoruffLorie KlodaPim CuijpersSimon GilbodyJohn IoannidisDean McMillanScott PattenIan ShrierRoy ZiegelsteinAinsley MooreDickens AkenaDagmar AmtmannBruce ArrollLiat AyalonHamid BaradaranAnna BeraldiCharles BernsteinArvin BhanaCharles BombardierRyna Imma BujiPeter ButterworthGregory CarterMarcos ChagasJuliana ChanLai Fong ChanDixon ChibandaRushina CholeraKerrie CloverAaron ConwayYeates ConwellFederico DarayJanneke de Man-van GinkelJaime DelgadilloCrisanto Diez-QuevedoJesse FannSally FieldJane FisherDaniel FungEmily GarmanBizu GelayeLeila GholizadehLorna GibsonFelicity Goodyear-SmithEric GreenCatherine GreenoBrian HallPetra HampelLiisa HantsooEmily HarozMartin HarterUlrich HegerlLeanne HidesStevan HobfollSimone HonikmanMarie HudsonThomas HyphantisMasatoshi InagakiKhalida IsmailHong Jin JeonNathalie JettéMohammad KhamsehKim KielySebastian KohlerBrandon KohrtYunxin KwanFemke LamersMaría Asunción LaraHolly Levin-AspensonValéria LinoShen-Ing LiuManote LotrakulSonia LoureiroBernd LöweNagendra LuitelCrick LundRuth Ann MarrieLaura MarshBrian MarxAnthony McGuireSherina Mohd SidikTiago MunhozKumiko MuramatsuJuliet NakkuLaura NavarreteFlávia OsórioVikram PatelBrian PencePhilippe PersoonsInge PetersenAngelo PicardiStephanie PughTerence QuinnElmars RancansSujit RathodKatrin ReuterSvenja RochAlasdair RooneyHeather RoweIná SantosMiranda SchramJuwita ShaabanEileen ShinnAbbey SidebottomAdam SimningLena SpangenbergLesley StaffordSharon SungKeiko SuzukiRichard SwartzPei Lin Lynnette TanMartin Taylor-RowanThach TranAlyna TurnerChristina van der Feltz-CornelisThandi van HeyningenHenk van WeertLynne WagnerJian Li WangJennifer WhiteKirsty WinkleyKaren WynterMitsuhiko YamadaQing Zhi ZengYuying Zhang
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Brooke Levis et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: The Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9) is a 9-item self-administered instrument used for detecting depression and assessing severity of depression. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) consists of the first 2 items of the PHQ-9 (which assess the frequency of depressed mood and anhedonia) and can be used as a first step to identify patients for evaluation with the full PHQ-9.

Objective: To estimate PHQ-2 accuracy alone and combined with the PHQ-9 for detecting major depression.

Data sources: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (January 2000-May 2018).

Study selection: Eligible data sets compared PHQ-2 scores with major depression diagnoses from a validated diagnostic interview.

Data extraction and synthesis: Individual participant data were synthesized with bivariate random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity of the PHQ-2 alone among studies using semistructured, fully structured, or Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) diagnostic interviews separately and in combination with the PHQ-9 vs the PHQ-9 alone for studies that used semistructured interviews. The PHQ-2 score ranges from 0 to 6, and the PHQ-9 score ranges from 0 to 27.

Results: Individual participant data were obtained from 100 of 136 eligible studies (44 318 participants; 4572 with major depression [10%]; mean [SD] age, 49 [17] years; 59% female). Among studies that used semistructured interviews, PHQ-2 sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were 0.91 (0.88-0.94) and 0.67 (0.64-0.71) for cutoff scores of 2 or greater and 0.72 (0.67-0.77) and 0.85 (0.83-0.87) for cutoff scores of 3 or greater. Sensitivity was significantly greater for semistructured vs fully structured interviews. Specificity was not significantly different across the types of interviews. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (0.86-0.89) for semistructured interviews, 0.82 (0.81-0.84) for fully structured interviews, and 0.87 (0.85-0.88) for the MINI. There were no significant subgroup differences. For semistructured interviews, sensitivity for PHQ-2 scores of 2 or greater followed by PHQ-9 scores of 10 or greater (0.82 [0.76-0.86]) was not significantly different than PHQ-9 scores of 10 or greater alone (0.86 [0.80-0.90]); specificity for the combination was significantly but minimally higher (0.87 [0.84-0.89] vs 0.85 [0.82-0.87]). The area under the curve was 0.90 (0.89-0.91). The combination was estimated to reduce the number of participants needing to complete the full PHQ-9 by 57% (56%-58%).

Conclusions and relevance: In an individual participant data meta-analysis of studies that compared PHQ scores with major depression diagnoses, the combination of PHQ-2 (with cutoff ≥2) followed by PHQ-9 (with cutoff ≥10) had similar sensitivity but higher specificity compared with PHQ-9 cutoff scores of 10 or greater alone. Further research is needed to understand the clinical and research value of this combined approach to screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of Study Selection Process
MINI indicates Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; PHQ, Patient Health Questionnaire.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Plots Comparing Sensitivity and Specificity Estimates for the Patient Health Questionnaire–2 (PHQ-2) Alone, the Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ-9) Alone, and for PHQ-2 Scores of 2 or Greater Followed By PHQ-9
The figure is for the 44 studies (participants = 10 627; No. with major depression = 1361) that used a semistructured reference standard and had both PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 item scores available. Among the 48 PHQ-2 studies that used a semistructured reference standard, 4 studies did not have PHQ-9 item scores available, and thus could not be included in the comparison of screening strategies. The PHQ-2 line has 7 calculated points (inflections), representing possible scores of 0 (right) to 6 (left). The PHQ-9 alone and PHQ-2 scores of 2 or greater followed by PHQ-9 lines have 28 calculated points (inflections), representing possible scores of 0 (right) to 27 (left). The area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.89) for PHQ-2 alone, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91-0.93) for PHQ-9 alone, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.89-0.91) for PHQ-2 scores of 2 or greater followed by PHQ-9.

References

    1. Thombs BD, Ziegelstein RC. Does depression screening improve depression outcomes in primary care? BMJ. 2014;348:g1253. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1253 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maurer DM, Raymond TJ, Davis BN. Depression: screening and diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(8):508-515. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell J, Trangle M, Degnan B, et al. Adult depression in primary care guideline. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Accessed April 7, 2020. https://pcptoolkit.beaconhealthoptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/IC...
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284-1292. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606-613. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding