Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;95(5):1467-1478.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12624. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

A review of the critics of invasion biology

Affiliations
Review

A review of the critics of invasion biology

Marcelo H Cassini. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Herein, I review existing criticisms of the field of invasion biology. Firstly, I identifiy problems of conceptual weaknesses, including disagreements regarding: (i) definitions of invasive, impact, and pristine conditions, and (ii) ecological assumptions such as species equilibrium, niche saturation, and climax communities. Secondly, I discuss methodological problems include the misuse of correlations, biases in impact reviews and risk assessment, and difficulties in predicting the effects of species introductions or eradications. Finally, I analyse the social conflict regarding invasive species management and differences in moral and philosophical foundations. I discuss the recent emergence of alternatives to traditional invasion biology approaches, including the concept of novel ecosystems, conciliation biology, and compassionate conservation. Understanding different value systems will be the first step to reconciling the different perspectives related to this controversial topic.

Keywords: biological introductions; conservation biology; ethics; exotic species; native species.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Asquith, N. M. (2001). Misdirections in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 15, 345-352.
    1. Bekoff, M. (2010). The Animal Manifesto: Six Reasons for Expanding our Compassion Footprint. New World Library, Novato.
    1. Bergstrom, D. M., Lucieer, A., Kiefer, K., Wasley, J., Belbin, L., Pedersen, T. & Chown, S. L. (2009). Indirect effects of invasive species removal devastate world Heritage Island. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 73-81.
    1. Blackburn, T. M., Pyšek, P. & Bacher, S. (2011). A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26, 333-339.
    1. Bojórquez-Tapia, L. A., Brower, L. P., Castilleja, G., Sánchez-Colón, S., Hernández, M., Calvert, W., Díaz, S., Gómez-Priego, P., Alcantar, G., Melgarejo, E. D., Solares, M. J., Gutiérrez, L. & Juárez, M. L. (2003). Mapping expert knowledge: redesigning the monarch butterfly biosphere reserve. Conservation Biology 17, 367-379.

LinkOut - more resources