Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;272(6):986-995.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003951.

The Carbon Footprint of Surgical Operations: A Systematic Review

Chantelle Rizan  1   2   3   4 , Ingeborg Steinbach  4 , Rosamond Nicholson  5 , Rob Lillywhite  6 , Malcolm Reed  2 , Mahmood F Bhutta  1   2   7
Affiliations

The Carbon Footprint of Surgical Operations: A Systematic Review

Chantelle Rizan et al. Ann Surg. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Of background data and objectives: Operating theatres are typically the most resource-intensive area of a hospital, 3-6 times more energy-intensive than the rest of the hospital and a major contributor of waste. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate existing literature calculating the carbon footprint of surgical operations, determining opportunities for improving the environmental impact of surgery.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane Database, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched and inclusion criteria applied. The study endpoints were extracted and compared, with the risk of bias determined.

Results: A total of 4604 records were identified, and 8 were eligible for inclusion. This review found that the carbon footprint of a single operation ranged 6-814 kg carbon dioxide equivalents. The studies found that major carbon hotspots within the examined operating theatres were electricity use, and procurement of consumables. It was possible to reduce the carbon footprint of surgery through improving energy-efficiency of theatres, using reusable or reprocessed surgical devices and streamlining processes. There were significant methodological limitations within included studies.

Conclusions: Future research should focus on optimizing the carbon footprint of operating theatres through streamlining operations, expanding assessments to other surgical contexts, and determining ways to reduce the footprint through targeting carbon hotspots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, et al. Managing the health effects of climate change: Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Lancet 2009; 373:1693–1733.
    1. Chung JW, Meltzer DO. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA 2009; 302:1970–1972.
    1. NHS Sustainable Development Unit, Stockholm Environment Institute. NHS England carbon emissions carbon footprinting report. London: Sustainable Development Unit; 2008. Available at: https://www.sduhealth.org.uk/policy-strategy/reporting/nhs-carbon-footpr.... Accessed April 30, 2020.
    1. Eckelman MJ, Sherman J. Environmental impacts of the U.S. health care system and effects on public health. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0157014.
    1. Sustainable Development Unit, Carbon Footprint update for NHS in England 2015. Cambridge: Sustainable Development Unit; 2016. Available at: https://www.sduhealth.org.uk/policy-strategy/reporting/nhs-carbon-footpr.... Accessed April 30, 2020.

Publication types