Reply to Peçanha Antonio et al.: Too Many Calories for All?
- PMID: 32516545
- PMCID: PMC7528800
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1810LE
Reply to Peçanha Antonio et al.: Too Many Calories for All?
Comment on
-
Outcomes Six Months after Delivering 100% or 70% of Enteral Calorie Requirements during Critical Illness (TARGET). A Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):814-822. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1810OC. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 31904995 Clinical Trial.
-
Too Many Calories for All?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):1059-1060. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1496LE. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32516541 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–406. - PubMed
-
- Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, et al. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:795–803. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, et al. PermiT Trial Group. Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2398–2408. - PubMed
-
- Chapman M, Peake SL, Bellomo R, Davies A, Deane A, Horowitz M, et al. TARGET Investigators, for the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Energy-dense versus routine enteral nutrition in the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1823–1834. - PubMed
-
- Deane AM, Little L, Bellomo R, Chapman MJ, Davies AR, Ferrie S, et al. Outcomes six months after delivering 100% or 70% of enteral calorie requirements during critical illness (TARGET): a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:814–822. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
