Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 8;21(2):124-129.
doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2020.2019.0175.

Endometrial "Scratching" An update and overview of current research

Affiliations

Endometrial "Scratching" An update and overview of current research

Veronika Günther et al. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. .

Abstract

About one in every six couples is affected by sterility. Assisted reproduction procedures are currently the treatment of choice for a number of patients who desire children. Many causes of sterility can be overcome with the aid of in vitro fertilization, but successful implantation of the embryos is the major limiting factor. Failure of implantation may occur repetitively. In the treatment of sterility, many approaches have been used to overcome the barrier of implantation failure and improve the chances of successful nidation. Scratching the endometrium prior to embryo transfer has been suggested as one means of enhancing the likelihood of implantation. The current literature was examined to investigate if there was any possible benefit from endometrial scratching. The studies were divided according to whether the women suffered from recurrent implantation failure or not. In summary, it was found that unselected subfertile women generally benefit less from endometrial scratching, but scratching appears to be successful in women who have experienced repeated implantation failure. Although the heterogeneous body of data on the subject deserves further clarification. The latest data presented at "European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology" 2018 in Barcelona suggested that the method should be abandoned.

Keywords: Infertility; perinatal immunology and inflammation; reproductive immunology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hysteroscopy Hysteroscopic view of an inconspicuous cavum uteri. In the middle of the picture the thrown-up endometrium is shown and in the rear part the exit of the right tube can be seen
Figure 2
Figure 2
a, b, c) Endometrial scratching For immunomodulatory stimulation, a mucosal lesion is created usually on the posterior wall with the hysteroscope

References

    1. ESHRE, A., Fact Sheet July 2014. Accessed 22 December 2015. [Internet] https://http://www.eshre.eu/guidelines-and-legal/art-fact-sheet.aspx .
    1. Narvekar SA, Gupta N, Shetty N, Kottur A, Srinivas MS, Rao KA. Does local endometrial injury in the nontransfer cycle improve the IVF-ET outcome in the subsequent cycle in patients with previous unsuccessful IVF? A randomized controlled pilot study. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2010;3:15–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dekel N, Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Racicot K, Mor G. The role of inflammation for a successful implantation. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;72:141–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan BK, Vandekerckhove P, Kennedy R, Keay SD. Investigation and current management of recurrent IVF treatment failure in the UK. BJOG. 2005;112:773–80. - PubMed
    1. Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:14–38. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources