Robotic pancreatic resection. Personal experience with 105 cases
- PMID: 32520131
- DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202501
Robotic pancreatic resection. Personal experience with 105 cases
Abstract
Objective: the first robotic pancreatic resection in Brazil was performed by our team in 2008. Since March 2018, a new policy prompted us to systematically employ the robot in all minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. The aim of this paper is to review our experience with robotic pancreatic resection.
Methods: all patients who underwent robotic pancreatic resection from March 2018 through December 2019 were identified. Descriptive data were collected. Preoperative variables included age, sex, and indication for surgery. Intraoperative variables included operative time, bleeding, blood transfusion.
Results: 105 patients underwent robotic pancreatectomy. Median age was 60.5 years old. Fifty-five patients were female. 51 patients underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomies, 34 distal pancreatectomy. Morbidity was 23.8%, mainly related to postoperative pancreatic fistula and one death occurred (mortality of 0.9%). Three patients (2.8%) were converted to open surgery. Four patients had delayed gastric emptying and two presented bleeding. Twenty-four patients had pancreatic fistula that was treated conservatively with late removal of the pancreatic drain. No patient required percutaneous drainage, reintervention or hospital readmission.
Conclusions: the robotic platform is useful for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy or after central pancreatectomy. It may increase the preservation of the spleen during distal pancreatectomies. Pancreas sparing techniques, such as enucleation, resection of uncinate process and central pancreatectomy, should be used to avoid exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency. Robotic resection of the pancreas is safe and feasible for selected patients. It should be performed in specialized centers by surgeons with experience in both open and minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic pancreatic resection. From enucleation to pancreatoduodenectomy. 11-year experience.Arq Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul-Sep;50(3):214-8. doi: 10.1590/S0004-28032013000200038. Arq Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24322194
-
A retrospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal resection and enucleation for potentially benign pancreatic neoplasms.Surg Today. 2020 Aug;50(8):872-880. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-01966-z. Epub 2020 Feb 3. Surg Today. 2020. PMID: 32016613
-
Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction.Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):256-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.246. Epub 2010 Nov 15. Arch Surg. 2011. PMID: 21079111
-
Pre- and intraoperative diagnostic requirements, benefits and risks of minimally invasive and robotic surgery for neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Oct;33(5):101294. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.101294. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019. PMID: 31351817 Review.
-
[Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors].Chirurg. 2017 Nov;88(11):934-943. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0496-y. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 28842736 Review. German.
Cited by
-
ROBOTIC PANCREATODUODENECTOMY IN BRAZIL: LESSONS AFTER 15 YEARS OF THE FIRST CASE.Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Sep 2;37:e1822. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400029e1822. eCollection 2024. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024. PMID: 39230103 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Increasing Complexity and Decreasing Complications with Experience: Single-Center Results from 150 Consecutive Patients.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):7012-7022. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15645-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38954090
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources