Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 1;156(8):874-881.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1573.

The Burden of Skin and Subcutaneous Diseases in the United States From 1990 to 2017

Affiliations

The Burden of Skin and Subcutaneous Diseases in the United States From 1990 to 2017

Melissa R Laughter et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Abstract

Importance: Skin and subcutaneous diseases affect the health of millions of individuals in the US. Data are needed that highlight the geographic trends and variations of skin disease burden across the country to guide health care decision-making.

Objective: To characterize trends and variations in the burden of skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases across the US from 1990 to 2017.

Design, setting, and participants: For this cohort study, data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD), a study with an online database that incorporates current and previous epidemiological studies of disease burden, and from GBD 2017, which includes more than 90 000 data sources such as systematic reviews, surveys, population-based disease registries, hospital inpatient and outpatient data, cohort studies, and autopsy data. The GBD separated skin conditions into 15 subcategories according to incidence, prevalence, adequacy of data, and standardized disease definitions. GBD 2017 also estimated the burden from melanoma of the skin and keratinocyte carcinoma. Data analysis for the present study was conducted from September 9, 2019, to March 31, 2020.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary study outcomes included age-standardized disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), incidence, and prevalence. The data were stratified by US states with the highest and lowest age-standardized DALY rate per 100 000 people, incidence, and prevalence of each skin condition. The percentage change in DALY rates in each state was calculated from 1990 to 2017.

Results: Overall, age-standardized DALY rates for skin and subcutaneous diseases increased from 1990 (821.6; 95% uncertainty interval [UI], 570.3-1124.9) to 2017 (884.2; 95% UI, 614.0-1207.9) in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The degree of increase varied according to geographic location, with the largest percentage change of 0.12% (95% UI, 0.09%-0.15%) in New York and the smallest percentage change of 0.04% (95% UI, 0.02%-0.07%) in Colorado, 0.04% (95% UI, 0.01%-0.06%) in Nevada, 0.04% (95% UI, 0.02%-0.07%) in New Mexico, and 0.04% (95% UI, 0.02%-0.07%) in Utah. The age-standardized DALY rate, incidence, and prevalence of specific skin conditions differed among the states. New York had the highest age-standardized DALY rate for skin and subcutaneous disease in 2017 (1097.0 [95% UI, 764.9-1496.1]), whereas Wyoming had the lowest age-standardized DALY rate (672.9 [95% UI, 465.6-922.3]). In all 50 states and the District of Columbia, women had higher age-standardized DALY rates for overall skin and subcutaneous diseases than men (women: 971.20 [95% UI, 676.76-1334.59] vs men: 799.23 [95% UI, 559.62-1091.50]). However, men had higher DALY rates than women for malignant melanoma (men: 80.82 [95% UI, 51.68-123.18] vs women: 42.74 [95% UI, 34.05-70.66]) and keratinocyte carcinomas (men: 37.56 [95% UI, 29.35-49.52] vs women: 14.42 [95% UI, 10.01-20.66]).

Conclusions and relevance: Data from the GBD suggest that the burden of skin and subcutaneous disease was large and that DALY rate trends varied across the US; the age-standardized DALY rate for keratinocyte carcinoma appeared greater in men. These findings can be used by states to target interventions and meet the needs of their population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Abuabara reported receiving personal fees from TARGET-DERM and grants from Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Dunnick reported receiving grants from Pfizer, Celgene, and Kyowa outside the submitted work. Dr Singh reported receiving personal fees from Crealta/Horizon, Medisys, Fidia, UBM LLC, Trio Health, Medscape, WebMD, Clinical Care Options, Clearview Healthcare Partners, Putnam Associates, Spherix, Practice Point Communications, the National Institutes of Health, the American College of Rheumatology, Simply Speaking, Amarin Pharmaceuticals, and Viking Pharmaceuticals as well as nonfinancial support from the Food and Drug Administration Arthritis Advisory Committee, Steering Committee of OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology), Veterans Affairs Rheumatology Field Advisory Committee, and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Satellite Center on Network Meta-Analysis outside the submitted work. Dr Dellavalle reported receiving grants from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, stock and meeting expense reimbursement from Altus labs, and personal fees from ParaPRO outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Maps of Age-Standardized Disability-Adjusted Life-Year (DALY) Rate for Total Skin and Subcutaneous Conditions in 1990 and 2017.
The conditions selected for monitoring by the Global Burden of Disease study were skin and subcutaneous diseases (A and B): dermatitis (atopic, seborrheic, and contact), psoriasis, cellulitis, pyoderma, scabies, fungal skin diseases, viral skin diseases, acne vulgaris, alopecia areata, pruritus, urticaria, decubitus ulcer, and other skin and subcutaneous diseases. Malignant melanoma of the skin (C and D) and keratinocyte carcinoma (E and F) were not included in the conditions selected for monitoring by the Global Burden of Disease study.

References

    1. Hay RJ, Johns NE, Williams HC, et al. . The global burden of skin disease in 2010: an analysis of the prevalence and impact of skin conditions. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(6):1527-1534. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.446 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH. The global burden of disease: a critical resource for informed policy making in the Gulf region. J Health Spec. 2016;4:162-172. http://www.thejhs.org/text.asp?2016/4/3/162/186482 doi:10.4103/2468-6360.186482 - DOI
    1. Karimkhani C, Dellavalle RP, Coffeng LE, et al. . Global skin disease morbidity and mortality: an update from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(5):406-412. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.5538 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. ; GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators . Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789-1858. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollestein LM, Nijsten T. An insight into the global burden of skin diseases. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134(6):1499-1501. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.513 - DOI - PubMed