Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul:79:101872.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101872. Epub 2020 May 27.

Moving towards specificity: A systematic review of cue features associated with reward and punishment in anorexia nervosa

Affiliations

Moving towards specificity: A systematic review of cue features associated with reward and punishment in anorexia nervosa

Ann F Haynos et al. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Models of anorexia nervosa (AN) posit that symptoms are maintained through deficient reward and enhanced punishment processing. However, theoretical and empirical inconsistencies highlight the need for a more nuanced conceptualization of this literature. Our goal was to comprehensively review the research on reward and punishment responding in AN from a cue-specific lens to determine which stimuli evoke or discourage reward and punishment responses in this population, and, ultimately, what properties these rewarding and punishing cues might share. A systematic review interrogating reward and punishment responses to specific cues yielded articles (n = 92) that examined responses to disorder relevant (e.g., food) and irrelevant (e.g., money) stimuli across self-report, behavioral, and biological indices. Overall, in most studies individuals with AN exhibited aversive responses to cues signaling higher body weights, social contexts, and monetary losses, and appetitive responses to cues for weight loss behaviors and thinness. Findings were more mixed on responses to palatable food and monetary gains. Results highlight that reward and punishment responding in AN are context specific and may be affected by varied stimulus qualities (e.g., predictability, controllability, delay, effort). Increasing specificity in future research on reward and punishment mechanisms in AN will better inform development of precisely-targeted interventions.

Keywords: Anorexia nervosa; Appetitive; Aversive; Eating disorders; Punishment; Reward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA (Moher et al., 2009) Flow Diagram for Systematic Review Note: AN = anorexia nervosa

References

    1. Ackard DM, Cronemeyer CL, Richter S, & Egan A (2015). Do symptom-specific stages of change predict eating disorder treatment outcome? Eating and Weight Disorders, 20, 49–62. - PubMed
    1. Affenito SG, Dohm FA, Crawford PB, Daniels SR, & Striegel-Moore RH (2002). Macronutrient intake in anorexia nervosa: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. The Journal of Pediatrics, 141, 701–705. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. Anderson LM, Crow SJ, & Peterson CB (2014). The impact of meal consumption on emotion among individuals with eating disorders. Eating and Weight Disorders, 19, 347–354. - PubMed
    1. Atiye M, Miettunen J, & Raevuori-Helkamaa A (2015). A meta-analysis of temperament in eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review, 23, 89–99. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources