Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;88(3):596-602.
doi: 10.1002/ana.25813. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Association between Pregnancy and Cervical Artery Dissection

Affiliations

Association between Pregnancy and Cervical Artery Dissection

Setareh Salehi Omran et al. Ann Neurol. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: We wanted to determine whether pregnancy is associated with cervical artery dissection.

Methods: We performed a case-control study using claims data from all nonfederal emergency departments and acute care hospitals in New York and Florida between 2005 and 2015. Cases were women 12-42 years of age hospitalized with cervical artery dissection, defined using validated diagnosis codes for carotid/vertebral artery dissection. Controls were women 12-42 years of age with a primary diagnosis of renal colic. Cases and controls were matched 1:1 on age, race, insurance, income, state, and visit year. The exposure variable was pregnancy, defined as labor and delivery within 90 days before or 6 months after the index visit. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of pregnancy between cases and controls. We performed a secondary cohort-crossover study comparing the risk of cervical artery dissection during pregnancy versus the same time period 1 year later.

Results: Pregnancy was twice as common among 826 women with cervical artery dissection compared with the 826 matched controls with renal colic (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.7). In our secondary analysis, pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of cervical artery dissection (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5), with the heightened risk limited to the postpartum period (IRR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.6-11.7).

Interpretation: Pregnancy, specifically the postpartum period, was associated with hospitalization for cervical artery dissection. Although these findings might in part reflect ascertainment bias, our results suggest that arterial dissection is one mechanism by which pregnancy can lead to stroke. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:596-602.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest: Nothing to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Timing of Cervical Artery Dissections During Pregnancy.

References

    1. James AH, Bushnell CD, Jamison MG, Myers ER. Incidence and risk factors for stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. Sep;106(3):509–16. - PubMed
    1. Feske SK. Stroke in pregnancy. Semin Neurol. 2007. Nov;27(5):442–52. - PubMed
    1. Bushnell C, McCullough LD, Awad IA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014. May;45(5):1545–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karkkainen H, Saarelainen H, Valtonen P, et al. Carotid artery elasticity decreases during pregnancy - the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. Mar 6;14:98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation. 2014. Sep 16;130(12):1003–8. - PubMed

Publication types