Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
- PMID: 32525900
- PMCID: PMC7289405
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234263
Comparison of real time and malachite-green based loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum
Abstract
The current context of malaria elimination requires urgent development and implementation of highly sensitive and specific methods for prompt detection and treatment of malaria parasites. Such methods should overcome current delays in diagnosis, allow the detection of low-density infections and address the difficulties in accessing remote endemic communities. In this study, we assessed the performance of the RealAmp and malachite-green loop mediated isothermal amplification (MG-LAMP) methodologies, using microscopy and conventional nested-PCR as reference techniques. Both LAMP techniques were performed for Plasmodium genus, P. falciparum, and P. vivax identification using 136 whole blood samples collected from three communities located in the Peruvian Amazon basin. Turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were estimated and compared to that of microscopy and nested-PCR. Using nested-PCR as reference standard, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all methods. RealAmp had a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 85-96.5%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 89.1-100%) for species detection; sensitivity and specificity of MG-LAMP were 94% (95% CI: 87.5-97.8%) and 100% (89.1-100%), respectively. Whereas microscopy showed 88.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 80.2-93.7%) and 100% specificity (95%: 89.1-100%). The turnaround time and costs of performing the LAMP assays were lower compared to those associated with nested-PCR but higher than those associated with microscopy. The two LAMP assays were shown to be more sensitive and simple to implement than microscopy. Both LAMP methodologies could be used as large-scale screening tests, but the MG-LAMP assay uses a simple, portable heat-block while the RealAmp requires a RealAmp machine or a real-time PCR machine. This makes the MG-LAMP an appropriate choice for malaria surveillance studies in endemic sites. Use of LAMP tests in active case detection of Plasmodium parasites could help to detect positive malaria cases early.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Evaluation of SYBR green I based visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for genus and species-specific diagnosis of malaria in P. vivax and P. falciparum endemic regions.J Vector Borne Dis. 2017 Jan-Mar;54(1):54-60. J Vector Borne Dis. 2017. PMID: 28352046
-
Field evaluation of a real time loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (RealAmp) for malaria diagnosis in Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre, Brazil.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 11;13(7):e0200492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200492. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29995953 Free PMC article.
-
Field evaluation of malaria malachite green loop-mediated isothermal amplification in health posts in Roraima state, Brazil.Malar J. 2019 Mar 25;18(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2722-1. Malar J. 2019. PMID: 30909912 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasensitive Diagnostics for Low-Density Asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum Infections in Low-Transmission Settings.J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4):e01508-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01508-20. Print 2021 Mar 19. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33148707 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) methods compared with microscopy, polymerase chain reaction and rapid diagnostic tests for malaria diagnosis.Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;98:408-419. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Jul 11. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32659450
Cited by
-
Validation study of Boil & Spin Malachite Green Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (B&S MG-LAMP) versus microscopy for malaria detection in the Peruvian Amazon.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 25;16(10):e0258722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258722. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34695122 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Methods for Non-Falciparum Malaria.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Jun 17;11:681063. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.681063. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34222049 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genomic surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax cases at the University Hospital in Tegucigalpa, Honduras.Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 1;10(1):20975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78103-w. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33262482 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of Malachite-Green LAMP for Diagnosis of Plasmodium and Five Human Malaria Species in a Nonendemic Setting.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Mar 14;106(5):1414-20. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-1151. Online ahead of print. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022. PMID: 35292597 Free PMC article.
-
Usefulness of a commercial LAMP assay for detection of malaria infection, including Plasmodium knowlesi cases, in returning travelers in Spain.BMC Res Notes. 2022 Apr 25;15(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06037-9. BMC Res Notes. 2022. PMID: 35468833 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. World malaria report. Geneva: 2019.
-
- Waltmann A, Darcy AW, Harris I, Koepfli C, Lodo J, Vahi V, et al. High Rates of Asymptomatic, Sub-microscopic Plasmodium vivax Infection and Disappearing Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in an Area of Low Transmission in Solomon Islands. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003758 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003758 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018 2018. Report No.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources