Compared to conventional physiotherapy, does the use of an ankle trainer device after Weber B ankle fracture operation improve outcome and shorten hospital stay? A randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 32526153
- PMCID: PMC7372581
- DOI: 10.1177/0269215520929727
Compared to conventional physiotherapy, does the use of an ankle trainer device after Weber B ankle fracture operation improve outcome and shorten hospital stay? A randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare the functional outcomes and length of hospital stay for patients treated with conventional physiotherapy compared to a new ankle trainer device after Weber B ankle fractures.
Design: The patients were randomized, and then followed up at 3, 6, 12 and 52 weeks by a blinded physiotherapist.
Setting: This study was done at a level 1 trauma centre.
Subjects: One hundred and forty consecutive patients with Weber B ankle fractures that were operated on were screened for eligibility, of whom 113 were included in the study.
Interventions: Conventional physiotherapy with stretching exercises, using a non-elastic band or using new ankle trainer.
Main measures: Outcomes were evaluated with Olerud-Molander ankle score, Visual analogue scale for pain and ankle dorsiflexion at 3, 6, 12 and 52 weeks follow-up. Time of hospitalization and complications were registered.
Results: Superior Olerud-Molander ankle scores were observed at three weeks follow-up in the ankle trainer group 40.9 (10.8), compared to the conventional group 35.3 (14.2) (P = 0.021). At one-year follow-up, there was no difference between the groups (P = 0.386). The ankle trainer group had a shorter hospital stay with a mean 2.6 days (0.98) compared to 3.2 days (1.47) in the conventional group (P = 0.026).
Conclusion: The patients who were treated with the new ankle trainer device recovered more rapidly, evaluated by the Olerud-Molander ankle score and had a shorter stay in hospital compared to the conventional physiotherapy group. No between group differences could be observed at long-term follow-up.
Keywords: Ankle injury; foot and ankle; orthopaedic outcomes; passive movement device; stretching.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Lin CW, Donkers NA, Refshauge KM, et al. Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD005595. - PubMed
-
- Keene DJ, Williamson E, Bruce J, et al. Early ankle movement versus immobilization in the postoperative management of ankle fracture in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44(9): 690–701, C1–C7. - PubMed
-
- Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Nightingale EJ, et al. Passive stretching does not enhance outcomes in patients with plantarflexion contracture after cast immobilization for ankle fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86(6): 1118–1126. - PubMed
-
- Shaffer MA, Okereke E, Esterhai JL, Jr, et al. Effects of immobilization on plantar-flexion torque, fatigue resistance, and functional ability following an ankle fracture. Phys Ther 2000; 80(8): 769–780. - PubMed
-
- Stevens JE, Walter GA, Okereke E, et al. Muscle adaptations with immobilization and rehabilitation after ankle fracture. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36(10): 1695–1701. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
