Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;82(4):175-180.
doi: 10.1159/000509143. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Affiliations

Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19

Antje Haehner et al. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2020.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent reports suggest that sudden smell loss might be a symptom of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of olfactory loss in an outpatient population who presented to a coronavirus testing center during a 2-week period and to evaluate the diagnostic value of the symptom "sudden smell loss" for screening procedures.

Methods: In this cross-sectional controlled cohort study, 500 patients who presented with symptoms of a common cold to a corona testing center and fulfilled corona testing criteria completed a standardized diagnostic questionnaire which included the patients' main symptoms, time course, and an additional self-assessment of the patients' current smell, taste function, and nasal breathing compared to the level before the onset of symptoms.

Results: Out of the 500 patients, 69 presented with olfactory loss. Twenty-two of them subsequently tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Only 12 out of the patients without olfactory loss tested positive, resulting in a frequency of 64.7% for the symptom "sudden smell loss" in COVID-19 patients. Compared to COVID-19 patients without smell loss, they were significantly younger and less severely affected. Changes in nasal airflow were significantly more pronounced in SARS-CoV-2 negative patients with olfactory complaints compared to the patients with smell loss who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. By excluding patients with a blocked nose, the symptom "sudden smell loss" can be attested a high specificity (97%) and a sensitivity of 65% with a positive predictive value of 63% and negative predictive value of 97% for COVID-19.

Conclusion: Considering the high frequency of smell loss in non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, acute olfactory impairment should be recognized as an early symptom of the disease and should be tested for on a regular basis. In contrast to other acute viral smell impairment, COVID-19-associated smell loss seems to be only rarely accompanied by a severely blocked nose.

Keywords: COVID-19; Diagnostic accuracy; Olfactory loss; SARS-CoV-2; Smell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Change in self-rated olfactory function and nasal breathing compared to the level before disease in SARS-CoV-2-positive (correct) and SARS-CoV-2-negative patients with smell loss (false positive).

References

    1. Heikkinen T, Järvinen A. The common cold. Lancet. 2003 Jan;361((9351)):51–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sugiura M, Aiba T, Mori J, Nakai Y. An epidemiological study of postviral olfactory disorder. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1998;538:191–6. - PubMed
    1. Konstantinidis I, Haehner A, Frasnelli J, Reden J, Quante G, Damm M, et al. Post-infectious olfactory dysfunction exhibits a seasonal pattern. Rhinology. 2006 Jun;44((2)):135–9. - PubMed
    1. Suzuki M, Saito K, Min WP, Vladau C, Toida K, Itoh H, et al. Identification of viruses in patients with postviral olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2007 Feb;117((2)):272–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hummel T, Whitcroft KL, Andrews P, Altundag A, Cinghi C, Costanzo RM, et al. Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. Rhinol Suppl. 2017 Mar;54((26)):1–30. - PubMed

MeSH terms