Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;14(1):69-75.
doi: 10.21053/ceo.2019.01851. Epub 2020 Jun 13.

Changes in Vestibular Symptoms and Function After Cochlear Implantation: Relevant Factors and Correlations With Residual Hearing

Jeong Hun Jang  1 , Hantai Kim  1 , Oak-Sung Choo  1 , Hun Yi Park  1 , Yun-Hoon Choung  1   2
Affiliations

Changes in Vestibular Symptoms and Function After Cochlear Implantation: Relevant Factors and Correlations With Residual Hearing

Jeong Hun Jang et al. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate vestibular function loss after cochlear implantation (CI) and the relationship between vestibular function and hearing changes.

Methods: Seventy-five patients with CI were enrolled and divided into those with normal preoperative caloric function (group I) and those with a normal preoperative waveform in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c-VEMP) testing (group II). The relationship between hearing and changes in the vestibular system was analyzed preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: In group I, unilateral weakness on the implanted side was detected in five (7.7%) and eight (12.3%) patients at 3 and 6 months post-CI, respectively. By 3 months post-CI, the total slow-phase velocity (SPV; warm and cold stimulations) was significantly different between the implanted and non-implanted sides (P=0.011), and the shift in total SPV from pre- to post-CI was significantly correlated with the average hearing threshold at 6 months post-CI. In group II, an abnormal c-VEMP was detected on the implanted side in six patients (16.2%) at 3 months post-CI, and in six patients (16.2%) at 6 months post-CI. Significant changes were noticed in the P1 and N1 amplitude at 3 months postCI (P=0.027 and P=0.019, respectively).

Conclusion: Vestibular function and residual hearing function should be afforded equal and simultaneous consideration in terms of preservation.

Keywords: Caloric Tests; Cochlear Implantation; Vertigo; Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential; Vestibular Function Tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart of this study. CI, cochlear implantation; c-VEMP, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The frequency of new-onset subjective dizziness according to electrode type (A), approach (B), and steroid administration (C). At 3 months post-cochlear implantation, subjective dizziness was somewhat more frequent in patients who underwent cochleostomy (P=0.077), and significantly more frequent in patients who had not been administered steroids (P=0.009). The statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test. RW, round window. *P<0.05.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Comparison of the maximum slow-phase velocity (SPV) total (warm and cold stimulations) according to the electrode type (A), approach (B), and steroid administration (C). The SPV total was greater in ears with cochlear implantation (CI) using a flexible electrode (3 months, 43.3±23.0; 6 months, 55.3±26.4) than in ears with CI using a precurved electrode (3 months, 33.2±16.7; 6 months, 27.2±17.4) or a straight electrode (3 months, 32.9±18.8; 6 months, 34.5±19.4), and the difference was statistically significant at 6 months post-CI (P=0.007). The statistical analysis was performed using the t-test. RW, round window. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Correlation between the average hearing threshold shift and the shift of the maximum slow-phase velocity (SPV) total (difference between the preoperative SPV total and postoperative SPV total) in group I. The statistical analysis was performed using correlation analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Santa Maria PL, Domville-Lewis C, Sucher CM, Chester-Browne R, Atlas MD. Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation: hearing and quality of life after 2 years. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):526–31. - PubMed
    1. Gstoettner WK, Helbig S, Maier N, Kiefer J, Radeloff A, Adunka OF. Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:49–56. - PubMed
    1. Eshraghi AA, Ahmed J, Krysiak E, Ila K, Ashman P, Telischi FF, et al. Clinical, surgical, and electrical factors impacting residual hearing in cochlear implant surgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;137(4):384–8. - PubMed
    1. Rajan GP, Kuthubutheen J, Hedne N, Krishnaswamy J. The role of preoperative, intratympanic glucocorticoids for hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: a prospective clinical study. Laryngoscope. 2012 Jan;122(1):190–5. - PubMed
    1. Hansel T, Gauger U, Bernhard N, Behzadi N, Romo Ventura ME, Hofmann V, et al. Meta-analysis of subjective complaints of vertigo and vestibular tests after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 2018 Sep;128(9):2110–23. - PubMed