A comparison of different physical stomach models and an analysis of shear stresses and strains in these system
- PMID: 32527487
- DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109296
A comparison of different physical stomach models and an analysis of shear stresses and strains in these system
Abstract
In this study, typical stomach characteristics, including the Migrating Motility Complex (MMC) and fed contractile pattern, have been summarised. The pH changes and enzyme degradation are discussed. Physical gastrointestinal models have been compared in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. The structures of the produced stomach parts are compared among the in-vitro models. Mathematical features of the models, including breaking time, emptying time and typical levels of shear stress and shear rate, have also been compared. Beaker-type systems typically involve shear stresses and strains that are orders of magnitude different from those in more realistic stomach systems. Transparent materials may help to observe the flow pattern and food breakdown in the stomach, while elastic materials may help to simulate the peristaltic movement. These models have considerable potential for answering questions about the dissolution and delivery of tablets, as well as answering fundamental questions about the hydrodynamics of the stomach and ultimately investigating diseases of the human gastrointestinal system.
Keywords: Experimental stomach models; Fluid mechanics; Hydrodynamics; Materials; Mathematical modelling; Migrating motility complex.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Comment in
-
Further comments on "A comparison of different physical stomach models and an analysis of shear stresses and strains in these system" by Zhong and Langrish (2020).Food Res Int. 2020 Oct;136:109542. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109542. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Food Res Int. 2020. PMID: 32846597
-
Comments on "A comparison of different physical stomach models and an analysis of shear stresses and strains in these system" by Zhong and Langrish (2020).Food Res Int. 2020 Nov;137:109429. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109429. Epub 2020 Jun 9. Food Res Int. 2020. PMID: 33233111
-
Response to comments on "A comparison of different physical stomach models and an analysis of shear stresses and strains in these system" by Wu and Chen (2020).Food Res Int. 2020 Nov;137:109442. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109442. Epub 2020 Jun 15. Food Res Int. 2020. PMID: 33233122
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources