IMRT Reduces Acute Toxicity in Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiation for Gastric Cancer
- PMID: 32529130
- PMCID: PMC7276694
- DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.11.003
IMRT Reduces Acute Toxicity in Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiation for Gastric Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Preoperative chemoradiation is being currently evaluated in 2 randomized international trials. However, chemoradiation for gastric cancer can be associated with relatively high rates of acute toxicity. We compared rates of toxicity, toxicity-related events, and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and those treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT).
Methods and materials: We retrospectively reviewed records of 202 patients with consecutive gastric cancer treated with preoperative intent radiation therapy at our institution from 1998 to 2018. Patients with gastroesophageal junction involvement and those with metastatic disease were excluded. Eighty-two patients received 3DCRT, and 120 patients received IMRT. The median radiation dose was 45 Gy, and 99% received concurrent chemotherapy.
Results: There were no significant differences between the 3DCRT and IMRT groups regarding sex, race, histology, tumor location, histology, or nodal stage. The rate of grade 3 to 4 acute toxicity was significantly lower in patients treated with IMRT compared with 3DCRT (49% vs 70%, P = .004). The composite rate of toxicity-related events (hospitalization, feeding tube use, intravenous rehydration, or radiation therapy breaks) was also significantly lower in patients treated with IMRT compared with 3DCRT (56% vs 85%, P <.001). In addition, 68% of patients who received IMRT and 73% of patients who received 3DCRT underwent subsequent surgical resection (P = .245). Among patients who underwent surgery, the 3-year overall survival rates were not significantly different between those treated with IMRT and 3DCRT (71% vs 69%, P = .786). Patients receiving IMRT had a significantly higher absolute nadir lymphocyte count compared with patients receiving 3DCRT (median, 0.21 vs 0.16 K/UL; P = .047).
Conclusions: Our study suggests that IMRT might significantly reduce rates of grade 3 to 4 acute toxicity and toxicity-related events compared with 3DCRT, with no significant difference in oncologic outcomes. IMRT is an appropriate and possibly preferable radiation modality in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation for gastric cancer.
© 2019 The Authors.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Clinical outcomes for gastric cancer following adjuvant chemoradiation utilizing intensity modulated versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.PLoS One. 2014 Jan 9;9(1):e82642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082642. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24416146 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative outcomes for three-dimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer.Dis Esophagus. 2015 May-Jun;28(4):352-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12203. Epub 2014 Mar 17. Dis Esophagus. 2015. PMID: 24635657
-
Acute toxicity with intensity modulated radiotherapy versus 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy during preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.Radiother Oncol. 2016 Nov;121(2):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.010. Epub 2016 Oct 14. Radiother Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27751605 Review.
-
Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is not superior to three-dimensional conformal radiation (3DCRT) for adjuvant gastric radiation: A matched pair analysis.J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Jul-Sep;11(3):623-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.150438. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015. PMID: 26458592
-
Evolution of radiation techniques in the treatment of mediastinal lymphoma: from 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT): a single-centre experience and review of the literature.Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150409. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150409. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26744079 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 2;13(3):582. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030582. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33540736 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Where Are We at?Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;14(12):3026. doi: 10.3390/cancers14123026. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35740693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shifting sands: the role of radiotherapy for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul 25;6:50. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.03.01. eCollection 2021. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 34423171 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of Preoperative Radiation Therapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Jun;55(2):584-598. doi: 10.1007/s12029-023-00985-6. Epub 2024 Feb 14. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38353901 Review.
-
Oncologic Benefit of Adjuvant Chemoradiation after D2 Gastrectomy: A Stepwise Hierarchical Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;12(8):2125. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082125. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32751879 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al-Batran S.E., Homann N., Pauligk C. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): A randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1948–1957. - PubMed
-
- Bang Y.-J., Kim Y.-W., Yang H.-K. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): A phase 3 open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:315–321. - PubMed
-
- Sakuramoto S., Sasako M., Yamaguchi T. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. New Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–1820. - PubMed
-
- Macdonald J.S., Smalley S.R., Benedetti J. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. New Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–730. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources