International surgical guidance for COVID-19: Validation using an international Delphi process - Cross-sectional study
- PMID: 32531308
- PMCID: PMC7282765
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.015
International surgical guidance for COVID-19: Validation using an international Delphi process - Cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: International professional bodies have been quick to disseminate initial guidance documents during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the absence of firm evidence, these have been developed by expert committees, limited in participant number. This study aimed to validate international COVID-19 surgical guidance using a rapid Delphi consensus exercise.
Methods: Delphi statements were directly mapped to guidance from surgical professional bodies in the US and Europe (SAGES/EAES), the UK (Joint RCS), and Australasia (RACS), to validate content against international consensus. Agreement from ≥70% participants was determined as consensus agreement.
Results: The Delphi exercise was completed by 339 individuals from 41 countries and 52 statements were mapped to the guidance, 47 (90.4%) reaching consensus agreement. Of these, 27 statements were mapped to SAGES/EAES guidance, 21 to the Joint RCS document, and 33 to the RACS document. Within the SAGES/EAES document, 92.9% of items reached consensus agreement (median 89.0%, range 60.5-99.2%), 90.4% within the Joint RCS document (87.6%, 63.4-97.9%), and 90.9% within the RACS document (85.5%, 18.7-98.8%). Statements lacking consensus related to the surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic), dual consultant operating, separate instrument decontamination, and stoma formation rather than anastomosis.
Conclusion: Initial surgical COVID-19 guidance from the US, Europe and Australasia was widely supported by an international expert community, although a small number of contentious areas emerged. These findings should be addressed in future guidance iterations, and should stimulate urgent investigation of non-consensus areas.
Keywords: COVID-19; Delphi consensus; Guidance; Surgery.
Copyright © 2020 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
An Invited Commentary: International surgical guidance for COVID-19: Validation using an international Delphi process.Int J Surg. 2020 Aug;80:41-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jun 27. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32603783 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery SAGES and EAES Recommendations Regarding Surgical Response to COVID-19 Crisis. https://www.sages.org/recommendations-surgical-response-covid-19/ Accessed: 21st April 2020.
-
- Association of Surgeons of Great Britain & Ireland Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/coronavirus/joint-guidance-for-surgeons-v2/ Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, et al. Updated Intercollegiate General Surgery Guidance on COVID-19. Accessed: 21st April 2020.
-
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons . Issued 17 April 2020. Guidelines for the Management of Surgical Patients during the Covid 19 Pandemic.https://umbraco.surgeons.org/media/5137/racs-guidelines-for-the-manageme... Accessed: 21st April 2020.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical