Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 12;21(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00488-0.

A qualitative study on aspects of consent for genomic research in communities with low literacy

Affiliations

A qualitative study on aspects of consent for genomic research in communities with low literacy

Daima Bukini et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Low literacy of study participants in Sub - Saharan Africa has been associated with poor comprehension during the consenting process in research participation. The concerns in comprehension are far greater when consenting to participate in genomic studies due to the complexity of the science involved. While efforts are made to explore possibilities of applying genomic technologies in diseases prevalent in Sub Saharan Africa, we ought to develop methods to improve participants' comprehension for genomic studies. The purpose of this study was to understand different approaches that can be used to seek consent from individuals with low literacy in Sub-Saharan African countries in genomic research to improve comprehension.

Methods: Using qualitative study design, we conducted focus-group discussions, in-depth interviews and participant observations as data collection methods. This study was embedded in a hospital based genomic study on Sickle Cell Disease at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the transcripts and field notes.

Results: Findings from this study show that literacy level has little influence on understanding the research details. According to the participants of this study, the methods used to provide information, the language, and time spent with the study participants were the key factors influencing understanding. The availability of group sessions held before individual consent to allow for a detailed questions and answers format was agreed to be the best method to facilitate the comprehension.

Conclusion: The quality of the consenting process of participants will be influence by a number of factors. The type of research consented for, where the research will be implemented and who are the potential study participants are amongst the factors that need to be assessed during the consenting. Measures to improve participants' comprehension need to be developed when consenting participants with low literacy level in genomic studies.

Keywords: Comprehension; Genomic studies; Informed consent; Low literacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflicting financial interests exist.

References

    1. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans. 2016.
    1. Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2015. 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701. - PubMed
    1. Holm S. International Encyclopedia of Ethics. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki.
    1. Chokshi DA, Thera MA, Parker M, Diakite M, Makani J, Kwiatkowski DP, et al. Valid consent for genomic epidemiology in developing countries. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e95. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kegley JAK. Challenges to informed consent. EMBO Rep. 2004. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400246. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources