Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 32533356
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07698-y
Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The ideal management for patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis is still controversial. Laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV), combined with laparoscopy and endoscopy, is a novel and attractive technique. The aim of this research was to compare LERV with traditional two-stage management, preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP + LC), for treating patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis.
Method: Four databases, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Medline, all updated to through September 2019, were searched to identify comparative studies on LERV versus ERCP + LC for treating cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Total operative time, successful common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance, postoperative morbidity, conversion to other procedures, and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Pooled data were measured by odds ratios (ORs) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Eight studies with a total of 1061 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 542 patients who received LERV and 519 patients who received ERCP + LC. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding successful CBD stone clearance (OR 2.20, P = 0.10), postoperative bleeding (OR 0.67, P = 0.37), postoperative cholangitis (OR 0.66, P = 0.53), postoperative bile leak (OR 0.87, P = 0.81), or conversion to other procedures (OR 0.75, P = 0.62). The total operative time was longer in the LERV group (MD = 44.93, P < 0.00001), while LERV was associated with less postoperative pancreatitis than the two-stage management group (OR 0.26, P = 0.0003). The incidence of overall morbidity was lower in the LERV group than in the two-stage management group (OR 0.41, P < 0.0001), and the LERV group had a shorter hospital stay (MD = - 3.52, P < 0.00001).
Conclusion: LERV is equivalent to traditional two-stage procedures in terms of CBD stone clearance and conversion, with less pancreatitis, lower overall morbidity, and shorter hospital stay but longer operation time. More clinical trials are needed to determine the best treatment for patients in different conditions.
Keywords: Cholecystocholedocholithiasis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Laparoendoscopic rendezvous; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of one stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intra-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus two-stage pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of pre-operatively diagnosed patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):770-778. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5739-y. Epub 2017 Jul 21. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 28733744
-
Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: a retrospectively cohort study.Surg Endosc. 2020 Jun;34(6):2483-2489. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07051-y. Epub 2019 Aug 19. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31428853
-
Two institutes' experience in laparoendoscopic "rendezvous" technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct: a prospective randomized comparative clinical trial.Updates Surg. 2024 Oct;76(6):2237-2245. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01973-6. Epub 2024 Sep 25. Updates Surg. 2024. PMID: 39320569 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3275-3286. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w. Epub 2018 Dec 3. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30511313 Review.
-
Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun 28;18(24):3156-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3156. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 22791952 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Safety and Cost Analysis of Outpatient Laparoendoscopy in the Treatment of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A Retrospective Study.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 14;13(2):460. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020460. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256593 Free PMC article.
-
Rendezvous procedure for choledocholithiasis in a Canadian rural surgical service.CMAJ. 2023 Apr 11;195(14):E513-E514. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.221707. CMAJ. 2023. Retraction in: CMAJ. 2023 Dec 17;195(49):E1727. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231703. PMID: 37040991 Free PMC article. Retracted. No abstract available.
-
Single stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Lesson learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic.Front Surg. 2024 Jun 18;11:1398854. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1398854. eCollection 2024. Front Surg. 2024. PMID: 38957742 Free PMC article.
-
Current management of concomitant cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb 27;15(2):169-176. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i2.169. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 36896310 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of different time intervals between laparoscopic cholecystectomy to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated by choledocholithiasis.Front Surg. 2023 Mar 15;9:1110242. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1110242. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37007627 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources