Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;26(5):2791-2808.
doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00229-x. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication

Affiliations
Review

The Ethical Interest of Frankenstein; Or, the Modern Prometheus: A Literature Review 200 Years After Its Publication

Irene Cambra-Badii et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Two hundred years after it was first published, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus remains relevant. This novel has endured because of its literary merits and because its themes lend themselves to analysis from multiple viewpoints. Scholars from many disciplines have examined this work in relation to controversial scientific research. In this paper, we review the academic literature where Frankenstein is used to discuss ethics, bioethics, science, technology and medicine. We searched the academic literature and carried out a content analysis of articles discussing the novel and films derived from it, analyzing the findings qualitatively and quantitatively. We recorded the following variables: year and language of publication, whether it referred to the novel or to a film, the academic discipline in which it was published, and the topics addressed in the analysis. Our findings indicate that the scientific literature on Frankenstein focuses mainly on science and the personality of the scientist rather than on the creature the scientist created or ethical aspects of his research. The scientist's responsibility is central to the ethical interest of Frankenstein; this issue entails both the motivation underlying the scientist's acts and the consequences of these acts.

Keywords: Ethics; Feature films; Frankenstein; Literature analysis; Science; Scientist.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Banerjee, S. (2011). Home is where mamma is: Reframing the science question in Frankenstein. Women's Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2011.527783 . - DOI
    1. Barns, I. (1990). Monstrous nature or technology?: Cinematic resolutions of the “Frankenstein Problem”. Science as Culture. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439009526278 . - DOI
    1. Bell, R., & Lederman, N. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063 . - DOI
    1. Bishop, M. (1994). The “making” and re-making of man: 1. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and transplant surgery. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87(12), 749–751.
    1. Brem, S., & Anijar, K. (2003). The bioethics of fiction: The chimera in film and print. American Journal of Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1162/15265160360706787 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources