Variation in recombination rate affects detection of outliers in genome scans under neutrality
- PMID: 32535981
- DOI: 10.1111/mec.15501
Variation in recombination rate affects detection of outliers in genome scans under neutrality
Abstract
Genome scans can potentially identify genetic loci involved in evolutionary processes such as local adaptation and gene flow. Here, we show that recombination rate variation across a neutrally evolving genome gives rise to mixed sampling distributions of mean FST ( ), a common population genetic summary statistic. In particular, we show that in regions of low recombination the distribution of estimates has more variance and a longer tail than in more highly recombining regions. Determining outliers from the genome-wide distribution without taking local recombination rate into consideration may therefore increase the frequency of false positives in low recombination regions and be overly conservative in more highly recombining ones. We perform genome scans on simulated and empirical Drosophila melanogaster data sets and, in both cases, find patterns consistent with this neutral model. Similar patterns are observed for other summary statistics used to capture variation in the coalescent process. Linked selection, particularly background selection, is often invoked to explain heterogeneity in across the genome, but here we point out that even under neutrality, statistical artefacts can arise due to variation in recombination rate. Our results highlight a flaw in the design of genome-scan studies and suggest that without estimates of local recombination rate, interpreting the genomic landscape of any summary statistic that captures variation in the coalescent process will be very difficult.
Keywords: adaptation; molecular evolution; population genetics-empirical; population genetics-theoretical.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
It's time to stop sweeping recombination rate under the genome scan rug.Mol Ecol. 2020 Nov;29(22):4249-4253. doi: 10.1111/mec.15690. Epub 2020 Nov 1. Mol Ecol. 2020. PMID: 33058346
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adrion, J. R., Cole, C. B., Dukler, N., Galloway, J. G., Gladstein, A. L., Gower, G., Kern, A. D. (2019). A community-maintained standard library of population genetic models. BioRxiv, 2019.12.20.885129. https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.20.885129
-
- Bhatia, G., Patterson, N., Sankararaman, S., & Price, A. L. (2013). Estimating and interpreting FST: The impact of rare variants. Genome Research, 23(9), 1514-1521. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.154831.113
-
- Burri, R. (2017). Interpreting differentiation landscapes in the light of long-term linked selection. Evolution Letters, 1(3), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.14
-
- Comeron, J. M., Ratnappan, R., & Bailin, S. (2012). The Many Landscapes of Recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics, 8(10), e1002905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002905
-
- Cruickshank, T. E., & Hahn, M. W. (2014). Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow. Molecular Ecology, 23(13), 3133-3157. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12796
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous
