Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;111(8):2850-2860.
doi: 10.1111/cas.14533. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

CENP-50 is required for papilloma development in the two-stage skin carcinogenesis model

Affiliations

CENP-50 is required for papilloma development in the two-stage skin carcinogenesis model

Megumi Saito et al. Cancer Sci. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

CENP-50/U is a component of the CENP-O complex (CENP-O/P/Q/R/U) and localizes to the centromere throughout the cell cycle. Aberrant expression of CENP-50/U has been reported in many types of cancers. However, as Cenp-50/U-deficient mice die during early embryogenesis, its functions remain poorly understood in vivo. To investigate the role of Cenp-50/U in skin carcinogenesis, we generated Cenp-50/U conditional knockout (K14CreER -Cenp-50/Ufl/fl ) mice and subjected them to the 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)/terephthalic acid (TPA) chemical carcinogenesis protocol. As a result, early-stage papillomas decreased in Cenp-50/U-deficient mice. In contrast, Cenp-50/U-deficient mice demonstrated almost the same carcinoma incidence as control mice. Furthermore, mRNA expression analysis using DMBA/TPA-induced papillomas and carcinomas revealed that Cenp-50/U expression levels in papillomas were significantly higher than in carcinomas. These results suggest that Cenp-50/U functions mainly in early papilloma development and it has little effect on malignant conversion.

Keywords: CENP; malignant conversion; mouse models; papilloma; two-stage skin carcinogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The CENP‐O family is expressed differently in skin tumors. mRNA expression levels in skin tumors (Papillomas/Skin (red) (n = 10), Carcinomas/Skin (blue) (n = 10)). mRNA expression levels detected by qRT‐PCR. A, Cenp‐50/U (P = .0253). B, Cenp‐r (P = .00140). C, Cenp‐o (P = .255). D, Cenp‐p (P = .771) and E, Cenp‐q (P = .212). These expression levels were normalized by Gapdh in skins, papillomas and carcinomas first and then the ratios between papillomas and skins and between carcinomas and skins are presented. The P‐values were calculated by two‐way ANOVA (**P < .01; *P < .05). n.s., not significant. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Generation of Cenp‐50/U knockout mice. A, Targeting strategy to generate mice lacking Cenp‐50/U. Blue boxes indicate the positions of exons. loxP was inserted into the genomic region in exons 4‐6 of the Cenp‐50/U gene. Red arrows indicate the construction primers for detection of the Cenp‐50/U fl/fl‐allele and Cenp‐50/U knockout allele. B, Genotype analysis of genomic DNA from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. The floxed allele and wild‐type allele were detected by 3F and 3R primers (floxed allele: approximately 500 bp, wild‐type allele: 350 bp). C, Genotype analysis of Cenp‐50/U knockout (KO) allele. The KO allele was detected by 5F and 3Rb primers (approximately 500 bp) using genomic DNA from mouse skins and tail. D, Cenp‐50/U expression levels detected by RT‐PCR. RT‐PCR analysis using mouse skins from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. Gapdh expression is shown as an internal control. E, Cenp‐50/U protein expression levels measured by western blot analysis using mouse skins from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. Actin expression is shown as an internal control
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cenp‐50/U‐deficient mice have a decrease in cell proliferation in normal skins. A, B, Immunostaining patterns of Ki67 (green) in skins from (A) Cenp‐50/U fl/fl and (B) K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. C, D, Representative TUNEL staining pattern of TdT (green) in skins from (C) Cenp‐50/U fl/fl and (D) K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. Cells were counterstained with Hoechst (red). E, The number of Ki67‐positive cells in skins from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 12) (red bar) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 12) (blue bar) mice (P = 4.93E‐8). F, The number of TUNEL‐positive cells in skins from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 7) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice (n = 7) (blue bar). G, Cell cycle analysis of mouse normal skins from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 6) (red bar) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 5) (blue bar) mice (G0/G1 phase: P = .00424, subG1 phase: P = .000203). DNA content was measured by propidium iodide (PI) staining. H, Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Cells were isolated from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 6) (red bar) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 5) (blue bar) mice (P = .002013). The P‐value was calculated by t test (**P < .01). n.s., not significant. n.d., not detected. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Cenp‐50/U functions in early tumor development. A, Comparison of DMBA/TPA‐induced papilloma numbers per mouse between Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 22) (red line) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 17) (blue line) mice. B, Number of papillomas < 2 mm per mouse. C, Number of papillomas 2‐6 mm per mouse. D, Number of papillomas >6 mm per mouse. Red bars represent Cenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. Blue bars represent K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. E, Representative photographs of Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (left) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (right) mice at 20 wk after initiation. The P‐values were calculated by t test (**P < .01; *P < .05). n.s., not significant. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD)
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Cenp‐50/U deficiency induces cell death in papillomas. A, B, Immunostaining patterns of Ki67 (green) and K14 (red) in papillomas from (A) Cenp‐50/U fl/fl and (B) K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice. C, D, Representative TUNEL staining pattern of TdT (green) in papillomas from (C) Cenp‐50/U fl/fl and (D) K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl mice (P = .00217). Cells were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). White inset boxes indicate the magnified region. E, The number of Ki67‐positive cells in papillomas from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 12) (red bar) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 12) (blue bar) mice (P = .144). F, The number of TUNEL‐positive cells in papillomas from Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 8) (red bar) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 8) (blue bar) mice. The P‐value was calculated by t test (**P < .01). n.s., not significant. Error bars represent the standard deviation (SD)
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Cenp‐50/U has little effect on malignant conversion. A, Comparison of the incidence of DMBA/TPA‐induced carcinoma between Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 22) (red line) and K14CreERCenp‐50 fl/fl (n = 17) (blue line) mice. B, Comparison of the incidence of DMBA/TPA‐induced carcinomas per papilloma between Cenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 172) (red line) and K14CerERCenp‐50/U fl/fl (n = 99) (blue line) mice
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Schematic drawing of the functions of Cenp‐50/U in the process of skin carcinogenesis. Cenp‐50/U regulates early papilloma development. Conversely, Cenp‐50/U has little effect on papilloma growth and malignant conversion

References

    1. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature. 1998;396:643‐649. - PubMed
    1. Fukagawa T, Earnshaw WC. The Centromere: Chromatin Foundation for the Kinetochore Machinery. Dev Cell. 2014;30:496‐508. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blower MD, Daigle T, Kaufman T, et al. Drosophila CENP‐A mutations cause a BubR1‐ dependent early mitotic delay without normal localization of kinetochore components. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tomonaga T, Matsushita K, Ishibashi M, et al. Centriomere protein H up‐regulated in primary human colorectal cancer and its overexpression induces aneuploidy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:4683‐4689. - PubMed
    1. Sun X, Clermont P‐L, Jiao W, et al. Elevated expression of the centromere protein‐A(CENP‐A)‐encoding gene as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in human cancers. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:899‐907. - PubMed

MeSH terms