Inter- and intraspecific differences in rotifer fatty acid composition during acclimation to low-quality food
- PMID: 32536305
- PMCID: PMC7333959
- DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0644
Inter- and intraspecific differences in rotifer fatty acid composition during acclimation to low-quality food
Abstract
Biochemical food quality constraints affect the performance of consumers and mediate trait variation among and within consumer species. To assess inter- and intraspecific differences in fatty acid retention and conversion in freshwater rotifers, we provided four strains of two closely related rotifer species, Brachionus calyciflorus sensu stricto and Brachionus fernandoi, with food algae differing in their fatty acid composition. The rotifers grazed for 5 days on either Nannochloropsis limnetica or Monoraphidium minutum, two food algae with distinct polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) profiles, before the diets were switched to PUFA-free Synechococcus elongatus, which was provided for three more days. We found between- and within-species differences in rotifer fatty acid compositions on the respective food sources and, in particular, highly specific acclimation reactions to the PUFA-free diet. The different reactions indicate inter- but also intraspecific differences in physiological traits, such as PUFA retention, allocation and bioconversion capacities, within the genus Brachionus that are most likely accompanied by differences in their nutritional demands. Our data suggest that biochemical food quality constraints act differently on traits of closely related species and of strains of a particular species and thus might be involved in shaping ecological interactions and evolutionary processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'The next horizons for lipids as 'trophic biomarkers': evidence and significance of consumer modification of dietary fatty acids'.
Keywords: Brachionus; PUFA composition; fatty acids; food quality; rotifer strains; trait variation.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare we have no competing interests.
Figures



References
-
- Andersen T, Elser JJ, Hessen DO. 2004. Stoichiometry and population dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 7, 884–900. (10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00646.x) - DOI
-
- Blomquist GJ, Borgeson CE, Vundla M. 1991. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and eicosanoids in insects. Insect Biochem. 21, 99–106. (10.1016/0020-1790(91)90069-q) - DOI
-
- Weber PC. 1989. Are we what we eat? Fatty acids in nutrition and in cell membranes: cell functions and disorders induced by dietary conditions. Svanøybukt, Norway: Svanøy Foundation.
-
- Stanley-Samuelson DW. 1994. The biological significance of prostaglandins and related eicosanoids in invertebrates. Integr. Comp. Biol. 34, 589–598. (10.1093/icb/34.6.589) - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources