Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020;59(12):1481-1488.
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4212-19. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature

Hayato Yamaguchi et al. Intern Med. 2020.

Abstract

Objective This study aims to elucidate the association between the clinical characteristics of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and quality indicators (QIs) of colonoscopy. Methods Patients with PCCRC who underwent total colonoscopy (TCS) and were histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma within six months to five years of the last examination were included in this study. PCCRC and normally detected cancer (NDC) identified within the same period were compared in terms of their clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, the QIs at PCCRC detection were compared to those at the last examination. Results Patients with PCCRC had a significantly higher rate of colon surgery history than those with NDC (PCCRC: 25/76, 32.9%; NDC: 31/1,437, 2.2%; p<0.001), but the invasion depth in these patients was significantly shallower (PCCRC: ≤Tis/≥T1, 37/39; NDC: ≤Tis/≥T1, 416/1,021; p<0.001). Among patients with PCCRC, the T1b group had significantly more non-polypoid growth (NPG)-type cases than PG-type CRC cases (p=0.018). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of colonoscopists performing TCS was 30.2-52.8%. Furthermore, the ADR of colonoscopists at the time of PCCRC detection (36.7%±5.9%) was significantly higher than that of colonoscopists who performed the last examination (34.9%±4.4%; p=0.034). The withdrawal time for negative colonoscopy (WT-NC) at detection was significantly longer than that at the last examination (at detection: 494.3±253.8 s; at last examination: 579.5±243.6 s; p=0.010). Conclusion Given that these PCCRC cases were post-colon surgery cases, had a long WT-NC, and were detected by colonoscopists with a high ADR, most cases showed lesions that were missed during the previous colonoscopy. Caution should be practiced in order to avoid missing flat, NPG-type tumors.

Keywords: adenoma detection rate; interval cancer; polypoid growth; post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer; quality indicator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram for the study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
One example of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (missed lesion). a: No clear adenomatous lesions was diagnosed on TCS performed for a positive fecal occult blood test. However, the lesions was found to have been hidden behind the mucosal folds. b: 8-mm IIa+IIc lesions found in the cecum at TCS performed 11 months later for a second positive fecal occult blood test result. c-e: Magnified observation: high irregular pit pattern (Vi) and scheduled for surgery. The invasion depth was SM massive invasion. TCS: total colonoscopy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. . Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut 61: 1576-1582, 2012. - PubMed
    1. Cooper GS, Xu F, Barnholtz Sloan JS, et al. . Prevalence and predictors of interval colorectal cancers in medicare beneficiaries. Cancer 118: 3044-3052, 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TM, et al. . Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 146: 950-960, 2014. - PubMed
    1. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 143: 844-857, 2012. - PubMed
    1. Singh S, Singh PP, Murad MH, et al. . Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 109: 1375-1389, 2014. - PubMed