The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature
- PMID: 32536675
- PMCID: PMC7364247
- DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4212-19
The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature
Abstract
Objective This study aims to elucidate the association between the clinical characteristics of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and quality indicators (QIs) of colonoscopy. Methods Patients with PCCRC who underwent total colonoscopy (TCS) and were histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma within six months to five years of the last examination were included in this study. PCCRC and normally detected cancer (NDC) identified within the same period were compared in terms of their clinicopathological characteristics. Furthermore, the QIs at PCCRC detection were compared to those at the last examination. Results Patients with PCCRC had a significantly higher rate of colon surgery history than those with NDC (PCCRC: 25/76, 32.9%; NDC: 31/1,437, 2.2%; p<0.001), but the invasion depth in these patients was significantly shallower (PCCRC: ≤Tis/≥T1, 37/39; NDC: ≤Tis/≥T1, 416/1,021; p<0.001). Among patients with PCCRC, the T1b group had significantly more non-polypoid growth (NPG)-type cases than PG-type CRC cases (p=0.018). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) of colonoscopists performing TCS was 30.2-52.8%. Furthermore, the ADR of colonoscopists at the time of PCCRC detection (36.7%±5.9%) was significantly higher than that of colonoscopists who performed the last examination (34.9%±4.4%; p=0.034). The withdrawal time for negative colonoscopy (WT-NC) at detection was significantly longer than that at the last examination (at detection: 494.3±253.8 s; at last examination: 579.5±243.6 s; p=0.010). Conclusion Given that these PCCRC cases were post-colon surgery cases, had a long WT-NC, and were detected by colonoscopists with a high ADR, most cases showed lesions that were missed during the previous colonoscopy. Caution should be practiced in order to avoid missing flat, NPG-type tumors.
Keywords: adenoma detection rate; interval cancer; polypoid growth; post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer; quality indicator.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Similar articles
-
Adenoma Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs : An Observational Cohort Study.Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar;176(3):303-310. doi: 10.7326/M22-1008. Epub 2023 Feb 21. Ann Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36802754
-
Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.Ann Intern Med. 2022 Oct;175(10):1366-1373. doi: 10.7326/M22-0301. Epub 2022 Sep 27. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 36162114
-
Temporal trends in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer rates in 50- to 74-year-old persons: a population-based study.Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1324-1334.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Jan 6. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29317271
-
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019. PMID: 31188154
-
Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be?Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Feb 28;21(4):9. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0678-5. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30815756 Review.
Cited by
-
Importance of preoperative total colonoscopy and endoscopic resection after self-expandable metallic stent placement for obstructive colorectal cancer as a bridge-to-surgery.BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02888-z. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37488479 Free PMC article.
-
AI support for colonoscopy quality control using CNN and transformer architectures.BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 9;24(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03354-0. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39123140 Free PMC article.
-
lncRNA pair as candidate diagnostic signature for colorectal cancer based on the within-sample relative expression levels.Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 17;12:912882. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912882. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36059706 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Its Subtypes in a Screening Programme.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 12;13(20):5105. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205105. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34680254 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic resection vs. endoscopic resection plus chemoradiation for T1 stage colorectal cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study.Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Feb 29;13(2):989-998. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-1411. Epub 2024 Jan 24. Transl Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 38482418 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. . Interval cancers after negative colonoscopy: population-based case-control study. Gut 61: 1576-1582, 2012. - PubMed
-
- Samadder NJ, Curtin K, Tuohy TM, et al. . Characteristics of missed or interval colorectal cancer and patient survival: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 146: 950-960, 2014. - PubMed
-
- Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. . Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 143: 844-857, 2012. - PubMed
-
- Singh S, Singh PP, Murad MH, et al. . Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 109: 1375-1389, 2014. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials