Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;7(3):268-276.
doi: 10.1093/nop/npz057. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

Radiosensitizers in the temozolomide era for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Affiliations
Review

Radiosensitizers in the temozolomide era for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Peter Mathen et al. Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a challenging diagnosis with almost universally poor prognosis. Though the survival advantage of postoperative radiation (RT) is well established, around 90% of patients will fail in the RT field. The high likelihood of local failure suggests the efficacy of RT needs to be improved to improve clinical outcomes. Radiosensitizers are an established method of enhancing RT cell killing through the addition of a pharmaceutical agent. Though the majority of trials using radiosensitizers have historically been unsuccessful, there continues to be interest with a variety of approaches having been employed. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents, and a number of other molecularly targeted agents have all been investigated as potential methods of radiosensitization in the temozolomide era. Outcomes have varied both in terms of toxicity and survival, but some agents such as valproic acid and bortezomib have demonstrated promising results. However, reporting of results in phase 2 trials in newly diagnosed GBM have been inconsistent, with no standard in reporting progression-free survival and toxicity. There is a pressing need for investigation of new agents; however, nearly all phase 3 trials of GBM patients of the past 25 years have demonstrated no improvement in outcomes. One proposed explanation for this is the selection of agents lacking sufficient preclinical data and/or based on poorly designed phase 2 trials. Radiosensitization may represent a viable strategy for improving GBM outcomes in newly diagnosed patients, and further investigation using agents with promising phase 2 data is warranted.

Keywords: glioblastoma; glioma; newly diagnosed; radiosensitizer; temozolomide.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, et al. . CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006-2010. Neuro Oncol. 2013;15(suppl 2):ii1–ii 56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Central Nervous System Cancers version 2.2018. 2018; https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cns.pdf. Accessed February 21, 2019.
    1. Corso CD, Bindra RS. Success and failures of combined modalities in glioblastoma multiforme: old problems and new directions. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016;26(4):281–298. - PubMed
    1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. ; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987–996. - PubMed
    1. Johnson PC, Hunt SJ, Drayer BP. Human cerebral gliomas: correlation of postmortem MR imaging and neuropathologic findings. Radiology. 1989;170(1 pt 1):211–217. - PubMed