Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2597.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002597. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Assessment of Epidemiological Trends in Craniosynostosis: Limitations of the Current Classification System

Santiago R Gonzalez  1 , Jeremy G Light  1 , Michael S Golinko  2
Affiliations

Assessment of Epidemiological Trends in Craniosynostosis: Limitations of the Current Classification System

Santiago R Gonzalez et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Craniosynostosis affects 1 in 2,000 live births, which makes it one of the most common craniofacial abnormalities in the United States. Despite this fact, few national epidemiologic reports exist, although US and European studies have reported an increased incidence of metopic craniosynostosis. The aim of our study is to analyze the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to support those conclusions.

Methods: We identified hospitalizations from 1998 to 2012 by using the ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for congenital anomalies of skull and face bones (756.0) and procedure codes related to craniosynostosis repair (2.01, 2.03, 2.04, 2.06).

Results: We analyzed data from 37,815 hospitalizations and 49,505 reconstructive procedures. There was a 61.6% increase in the number of hospitalizations related to craniosynostosis repairs. There was a 180% increase in bone graft to skull procedures, 109% increase in other cranial osteoplasty, 54% increase in formation of cranial bone flap, and a 6% decrease in opening of cranial suture.

Conclusions: We observed a steady rise in the number of craniosynostosis repairs performed, but whether this is a result of a true increase in incidence, better diagnosis, or change in treatment patterns needs further research. The current classification system does not provide information about the specific suture affected (metopic, sagittal, etc.), the type of repair performed (endoscopic, fronto-orbito advancement, etc.), and whether the repair is a primary procedure or a revision. More descriptive diagnosis and procedural codes are imperative to improve the epidemiologic and outcomes data of craniosynostosis in the United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

References

    1. Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Renier D. Evolution in the frequency of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4:21–25. - PubMed
    1. Lee HQ, Hutson JM, Wray AC, et al. Changing epidemiology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and revisiting the risk factors. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1245–1251. - PubMed
    1. Boulet SL, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA. A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989–2003. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A:984–991. - PubMed
    1. Kweldam CF, van der Vlugt JJ, van der Meulen JJ. The incidence of craniosynostosis in the Netherlands, 1997-2007. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:583–588. - PubMed
    1. Selber J, Reid RR, Chike-Obi CJ, et al. The changing epidemiologic spectrum of single-suture synostoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:527–533. - PubMed