Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2700.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002700. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Pectoral Fascia Preservation in Oncological Mastectomy to Reduce Complications and Improve Reconstructions: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Pectoral Fascia Preservation in Oncological Mastectomy to Reduce Complications and Improve Reconstructions: A Systematic Review

Jaco Suijker et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Excision of the pectoral fascia (PF) is routinely performed in oncological mastectomies. Preservation of the PF may, however, decrease postoperative complication rates for bleeding, infections, and seroma. It may also improve reconstructive outcomes by better prosthesis coverage, thereby reducing implant extrusion rates and improving cosmetic outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis principles was performed. Studies describing PF preservation were searched in 3 databases. All studies including more than 10 patients were included. The main outcomes were oncological safety (local recurrence, regional and distant metastases, and mortality rates), complication rates (bleeding, infections, seroma), loss of the prosthesis after reconstructive surgery, and cosmetic outcomes following reconstruction.

Results: Five studies were included. Three reported on 2 different randomized controlled trials (n = 73, and n = 244), and 2 studies were retrospective case series (n = 203 and n = 256). PF preservation did not affect oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrences, regional and distant metastases, or mortality rates. One study described a significantly lower incidence of seroma in the PF preservation group. No differences were found for bleeding complications and infections. No objective data were provided for reconstructive complications or cosmetic outcomes.

Conclusions: The literature on PF preservation is scarce. Based on the current evidence, PF preservation seems oncologically safe while potentially reducing postoperative complication rates. It is expected that reconstructive outcomes will benefit from PF preservation, but these studies lack evidence on this topic. Future studies should provide insight into all aspects of PF preservation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclaimer: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowchart according to the PRISMA principles describing the selection process of this systematic review of the literature towards pectoral fascia preservation in oncological mastectomy. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis.

References

    1. Halsted WS. I. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg. 1894;20:497–555. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patey DH, Dyson WH. The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to the type of operation performed. Br J Cancer. 1948;2:7–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zurrida S, Bassi F, Arnone P, et al. The changing face of mastectomy (from mutilation to aid to breast reconstruction). Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:980158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kennedy CS, Miller E. Simple mastectomy for mammary carcinoma. Ann Surg. 1963;157:161–162. - PubMed
    1. Cody HS., III Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 1999;6:13–22. - PubMed