Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2701.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002701. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Breast Reconstruction with a Lateral Breast Free Flap: A New Application of Breast-sharing

Affiliations
Case Reports

Breast Reconstruction with a Lateral Breast Free Flap: A New Application of Breast-sharing

Carlos E Lopez et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Breast reconstruction using contralateral autologous tissue, also known as breast sharing, is a viable option previously described in the literature, whereby flaps based on perforators of the internal mammary artery (internal mammary artery pedicle) are used. We report a postoncological breast reconstruction case using a microvascular flap taken from the lateral pole of the contralateral breast. We highlight the importance of preserving the medial pole of the donor breast for improving cosmesis, avoiding symmastia, and preserving the intermammary sulcus, as a difference with flaps based on the internal mammary artery pedicle flaps. Breast sensation could be recovered by neurotization of the lateral intercostal nerve, which may be included in the contralateral breast flap to be transferred. Contralateral breast free flaps could be an alternative to reconstruct the breast in selected patients. Oncological risk factors are discussed. Advances in genetic testing and tumor cell biology could help us to select the accurate candidates for this reconstructive technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Postoperative of right mastectomy and expander reconstruction, there is cephalic displacement of the expander and left mammary hypertrophy. Design of superomedial pedicle left reduction mammoplasty. Striped area corresponds to the skin and breast tissue discarded in a breast reduction and to be used as the breast free flap to be transferred.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Intraoperative flap dissection with the nipple and the areola in a superior medial dermoglandular pedicle, and the inferior lateral flap to be transferred based on 3 available pedicles: perforators of anterior thoracodorsal artery, serratus anterior artery perforator, and lateral thoracic artery.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Postoperative result after tattoo nipple and areola reconstruction. A, Frontal view. B, Oblique view.

References

    1. Pirro O, Mestak O, Vindigni V, et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after implant versus autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1217. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bletsis P, Bucknor A, Chattha A, et al. Evaluation of contralateral and bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80:S144–S149. - PubMed
    1. Visser NJ, Damen TH, Timman R, et al. Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:26–36. - PubMed
    1. Coriddi M, Shenaq D, Kenworthy E, et al. Autologous breast reconstruction after failed implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of surgical and patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:373–379. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson JA, Disa JJ. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;1405S Advances in Breast Reconstruction60S–68S. - PubMed

Publication types