Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;23(9):1404-1420.
doi: 10.1111/ele.13535. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation

Affiliations
Review

Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation

Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez et al. Ecol Lett. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Agriculture and development transform forest ecosystems to human-modified landscapes. Decades of research in ecology have generated myriad concepts for the appropriate management of these landscapes. Yet, these concepts are often contradictory and apply at different spatial scales, making the design of biodiversity-friendly landscapes challenging. Here, we combine concepts with empirical support to design optimal landscape scenarios for forest-dwelling species. The supported concepts indicate that appropriately sized landscapes should contain ≥ 40% forest cover, although higher percentages are likely needed in the tropics. Forest cover should be configured with c. 10% in a very large forest patch, and the remaining 30% in many evenly dispersed smaller patches and semi-natural treed elements (e.g. vegetation corridors). Importantly, the patches should be embedded in a high-quality matrix. The proposed landscape scenarios represent an optimal compromise between delivery of goods and services to humans and preserving most forest wildlife, and can therefore guide forest preservation and restoration strategies.

Keywords: Biodiversity crisis; SLOSS debate; extinction threshold; habitat amount hypothesis; habitat fragmentation; land sparing; land-use planning; matrix quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alamgir, M., Campbell, M.J., Sloan, S., Goosem, M., Clements, G.R., Mahmoud, M.I. et al. (2017). Economic, socio-political and environmental risks of road development in the tropics. Curr. Biol., 27, R1130-R1140.
    1. Andrén, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71, 355-366.
    1. Arce-Peña, N.P., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., San-José, M., Jiménez-González, D., Franch-Pardo, I., Andresen, E. et al. (2019). Landscape predictors of rodent dynamics in fragmented rainforests. Biodivers. Conserv., 28, 655-669.
    1. Aronson, J. & Alexander, S. (2013). Ecosystem restoration is now a global priority: time to roll up our sleeves. Restor. Ecol., 21, 293-296.
    1. Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Melo, F.P.L., Martínez-Ramos, M., Bongers, F., Chazdon, R., Meave, J.A. et al. (2017b). Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: New insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research. Biol. Rev., 92, 326-340.

LinkOut - more resources