Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;17(5):1462-1482.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13395. Epub 2020 Jun 14.

Patient involvement in surgical wound care research: A scoping review

Affiliations

Patient involvement in surgical wound care research: A scoping review

Rachel Muir et al. Int Wound J. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Active involvement of patients in planning, conducting, and disseminating research has been adopted by many organisations internationally, but the extent to which this occurs in surgical wound care is not evident. This scoping review aimed to identify how patients have been involved in surgical wound care research and the quality of its reporting. Full-text studies focused on preoperative and postoperative surgical wound care in the acute care setting, published in English between 2004 and 2019, were included in the review. Screening, data charting, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers independently, adjudicated by a third, and then reviewed by five others. Thematic analysis synthesised the findings. Of the eight included studies, seven explained the methods for patient involvement and five described aims related to patient involvement and commented on patient involvement in the discussion. None met all of the quality assessment criteria. Three themes emerged: involvement in modifying and refining research processes, connecting and balancing expert and patient views, and sharing personal insights. Recommendations to improve patient involvement in surgical wounds research include the following: using framework and tools to inform future research; training researcher and patients in their respective research roles; and ongoing monitoring of patient involvement.

Keywords: consumer involvement; patient participation; research; surgical wounds; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flow chart of studies 27

References

    1. National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) . A Model Framework for Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia; 2004.
    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient‐Oriented Research—Patient Engagement Framework—CIHR 2014. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html. Accessed March 20, 2020.
    1. Department of Health . Patient and Public Involvement in the New NHS. London, UK: Department of Health; 1999.
    1. Consumers Health Forum . Shifting Gears—Consumers Transforming Health. A White Paper. Canberra: CHF; 2018.
    1. Jones EL, Williams‐Yesson BA, Hackett RC, Staniszewska SH, Evans D, Francis NK. Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2015;261(2):243‐250. 10.1097/sla.0000000000000768. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types