Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jun 1;66(6).
doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.191139.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein for Acute Intestinal Ischemia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein for Acute Intestinal Ischemia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chun-Mei Ding et al. Clin Lab. .

Abstract

Background: Some studies have investigated the diagnostic value of intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) for acute intestinal ischemia (II), but the results were not always consistent. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of I-FABP for II.

Methods: Publications included in the PubMed and EMBASE before April 7, 2019 were retrieved to identify studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of I-FABP for II. The Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of eligible studies. Diagnostic accuracy of I-FABP in all eligible studies was pooled by a bivariate model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) were constructed to calculate the overall diagnostic accuracy of I-FABP.

Results: A total of 10 studies with 1,265 (219 IIs and 1,046 controls) subjects were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The major design weaknesses of included studies were patient selection bias. The overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of I-FABP were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68 - 0.82), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74 - 0.92), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79 - 0.86), respectively. In patients with acute abdominal pain, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of I-FABP were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59 - 0.81), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.69 - 0.97) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.83), respectively.

Conclusions: I-FABP has moderate diagnostic accuracy for II. Due the patient selection bias of available studies, further studies with rigorous design are needed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of I-FABP for II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances

LinkOut - more resources