Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):76.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00705-2.

Upper limb kinematics during the first year after stroke: the stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT)

Gyrd Thrane  1   2 , Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen  3 , Margit Alt Murphy  3
Affiliations

Upper limb kinematics during the first year after stroke: the stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT)

Gyrd Thrane et al. J Neuroeng Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Reduction of compensation and improved movement quality indicate recovery after stroke. Since clinical measures alone are often inadequate to distinguish between behavioral recovery and compensation, kinematic analysis of functional tasks has been recommended.

Objective: To quantify longitudinal changes and residual deficits in movement performance and quality during the first year after stroke using kinematic analysis of drinking task.

Methods: A total of 56 participants with first ever stroke causing upper extremity impairment were extracted from a non-selected stroke unit cohort (Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg-SALGOT). Participants needed to able to perform the drinking task with the more-affected arm at least on 2 occasions out of 6 (3 days, 10 days, 4 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months) during the first year to be included. A cohort of 60 healthy individuals was used as reference. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed models.

Results: Movement time, number of movement units, peak angular velocity of the elbow, peak hand velocity, and trunk displacement improved significantly over the first 3 months with a peak at 6 months. Movement time and peak hand velocity reached levels comparable to healthy at 3 months, but number of movement units, peak elbow angular velocity, trunk displacement, and arm abduction remained different from healthy over the first year after stroke.

Conclusions: Even when the recovery patterns of kinematics follow the known nonlinear pattern, not all kinematic measures reach the levels in par with healthy controls at one year post stroke. Since the number of movement units, peak angular velocity, trunk displacement, and arm abduction remained impaired over the first year, they might be the most suited measures to distinguish behavioral recovery from compensation strategies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials: NCT01115348. 4 May 2010. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Kinematics; Motor impairment; Movement analysis; Recovery; Stroke; Upper extremity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study inclusion process and the samples taken for analysis. SALGOT, Stroke Arm Longitudinal Study at the University of Gothenburg; FMA, Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The effect of time on kinematic variables. A value of 100 represents the median result of the healthy participants. Higher values represent better motor function. Abbreviations: ABD, Arm abduction during drinking; MT, Total movement time; NMU, Number of movement units; TD, Trunk displacement; PEAV, peak angular velocity; PHV, Peak Hand Velocity; T2PHV, relative time to Peak Hand Velocity. The variables are shifted 1 point for better visualization
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wade DT, Wood VA, Hewer RL. Recovery after stroke - the first 3 months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48(1):7–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guidetti S, Ytterberg C, Ekstam L, Johansson U, Eriksson G. Changes in the impact of stroke between 3 and 12 months post-stroke, assessed with the stroke impact scale. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(10):963–968. - PubMed
    1. Ytterberg C, Dyback M, Bergstrom A, Guidetti S, Eriksson G. Perceived impact of stroke six years after onset, and changes in impact between one and six years. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(8):637–643. - PubMed
    1. Paanalahti M, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Arndt A, Sunnerhagen KS. Applying the comprehensive international classification of functioning, disability and health Core sets for stroke framework to stroke survivors living in the community. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(4):331–340. - PubMed
    1. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(4):313–319. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data