Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e215-e222.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000897.

Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Using Tissue Anchoring System Versus a Traditional Technique for Women With Apical Vaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rodrigo Aquino Castro, Maria Augusta Tezelli Bortolini  1 , Ana Lívia Garcia Pascom  1 , Marta Ledesma  2 , Juan José Luis Sardi  3 , Marilene Vale de Castro Monteiro  4 , Sebastián Perez Junqueira  5 , Edna Cortes Fuentes  6
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Using Tissue Anchoring System Versus a Traditional Technique for Women With Apical Vaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rodrigo Aquino Castro et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the tissue anchoring system (TAS) kit versus the traditional technique for sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) to treat apical vaginal wall prolapse.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter study of noninferiority involving women with apical prolapse (C-point≥+1). Primary outcome is surgical success as C-point≤-4 at the 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes are success according to the composite criteria as C-point≤-4, Ba-point ≤0, and Bp-point ≤0; POP-Q measures of the vaginal compartments; intraoperative findings, complications; reoperation rate; hospital stay; and quality of life and sexual functioning (PISQ-12). It was estimated that 50 individuals per group would yield an 80% power for a noninferiority margin of 15%.

Results: Ninety-nine women were randomized: TAS (n = 55) and traditional SSLF (n = 44). The groups' preoperative data were similar. Drop-out rate was 11% for 12-month follow-up. Success rates were 90% for TAS and 80% for traditional SSLF (P = 0.0006; absolute difference, 9.8%; 90% confidence interval, -5.2 to 24.8) with the sensivity analyses per-protocol considering only the subjects that completed the 12-month follow-up and 80% versus 73%, respectively (P = 0.0048; absolute difference, 7.3%; 90% confidence interval, -9.6 to 24.2) by sensivity analyses considering the total number of participants randomized and treated with drop-out cases as failure. We detected shorter intraoperative time to dissect and reach the SSL, shorter length of hospitalization, lower rates of urinary tract infection, and lower pain scores in the first 30 days postoperative in the TAS compared with the traditional SSLF groups (P < 0.05). There was an improvement in women's quality of life that did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: The modified technique of SSLF using the TAS kit is noninferior to the traditional technique for the treatment of apical compartment in 12-month follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An international Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:165–194.
    1. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1160–1166.
    1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501–506.
    1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;10:CD012376.
    1. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:108–115.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources