Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;46(8):1189-1197.
doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000269.

Prevention and management of refractive prediction errors following cataract surgery

Affiliations
Review

Prevention and management of refractive prediction errors following cataract surgery

Jeremy Z Kieval et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Patient satisfaction after modern day cataract surgery requires excellent surgical technique but increasingly demands superior refractive outcomes as well. In many cases, there exists an expectation from patients, as well as surgeons, to achieve emmetropia after cataract surgery. This is particularly true in patients electing premium intraocular lens technology to correct astigmatism and presbyopia to minimize spectacle dependence. Despite continued advances in preoperative and intraoperative diagnostics, refractive planning, and surgical technology, residual refractive error remains a primary source of dissatisfaction after cataract surgery. The need to enhance refractive outcomes and treat residual astigmatic or spherical refractive errors postoperatively becomes paramount to meeting the expectations of patients in their surgical outcome. This article reviews the potential preoperative and intraoperative pitfalls that can be the source of refractive error, the various options to enhance refractive outcomes, and potential future technologies to limit residual refractive error after cataract surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Narváez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:2050–2053
    1. Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;11:1965–1970
    1. de Vries NE, Webers CA, Touwslager WR, Bauer NJC, de Brabander J, Berendschot TT, Nuijts RMMA. Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:859–865
    1. Lundstrom M, Dickman M, Hentry Y, Manning S, Rosen P, Tassiqnon MJ, Yong D, Stenevi U. Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: analysis of 282811 cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018;44:447–452
    1. Darcy K, Gunn D, Tavassoli S, Sparrow J, Kane JX. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated IOL power calculation formulas in 10930 eyes from the UK National Health Service. J Cartaract Refract Surg 2019;46:2–7

OTHER CITED MATERIAL

    1. The American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery Clinical Survey, 2018.
    1. Astigmatismfix.com by John Berdahl, MD and David Hardten, MD. Available at: ASCRS.org.

LinkOut - more resources