The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19
- PMID: 32541493
- PMCID: PMC7302613
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603
The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19
Abstract
In December 2019, a new coronavirus was found in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, and spread rapidly throughout the country, attracting global attention. On February 11, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially named the disease caused by 2019-nCoV coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). With the increasing number of cases, health care workers (HCWs) from all over China volunteered to work in Hubei Province. Because of the strong infectivity of COVID-19, HCWs need to wear personal protective equipment (PPE), such as N95 masks, latex gloves, and protective clothing. Due to the long-term use of PPE, many adverse skin reactions may occur. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the adverse skin reactions among HCWs using PPE.Questionnaires were used for the research; a quantitative study was carried out to determine the incidence of adverse skin reactions among HCWs using PPE.A total of 61 valid questionnaires were collected. The most common adverse skin reactions among HCWs wearing N95 masks were nasal bridge scarring (68.9%) and facial itching (27.9%). The most common adverse skin reactions among HCWs wearing latex gloves were dry skin (55.7%), itching (31.2%), and rash (23.0%). The most common adverse skin reactions among HCWs wearing protective clothing were dry skin (36.1%) and itching (34.4%).When most HCWs wear PPE for a long period of time, they will experience adverse skin reactions. The incidence of adverse skin reactions to the N95 mask was 95.1%, that to latex gloves was 88.5%, and that to protective clothing was 60.7%.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prophylactic Dressings for Maintaining Skin Integrity of Healthcare Workers When Using N95 Respirators While Preventing Contamination Due to the Novel Coronavirus: A Quality Improvement Project.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;47(6):551-557. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000713. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020. PMID: 33201140 Free PMC article.
-
Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international survey.J Crit Care. 2020 Oct;59:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 13. J Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32570052 Free PMC article.
-
Does Wearing a Face Mask During the COVID-19 Pandemic Increase the Incidence of Dermatological Conditions in Health Care Workers? Narrative Literature Review.JMIR Dermatol. 2021 May 6;4(1):e22789. doi: 10.2196/22789. eCollection 2021 Jan-Jun. JMIR Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 34028470 Free PMC article.
-
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection among healthcare workers - What is the evidence?Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13617. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13617. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Int J Clin Pract. 2020. PMID: 32734641 Review.
-
The need of health policy perspective to protect Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 pandemic. A GRADE rapid review on the N95 respirators effectiveness.PLoS One. 2020 Jun 3;15(6):e0234025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234025. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32492045 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Protective Face Masks: Effect on the Oxygenation and Heart Rate Status of Oral Surgeons during Surgery.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 28;18(5):2363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052363. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33670983 Free PMC article.
-
Skin Reactions to Personal Protective Equipment among First-Line COVID-19 Healthcare Workers: A Survey in Northern Morocco.Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 Oct 9;65(8):998-1003. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab018. Ann Work Expo Health. 2021. PMID: 33876214 Free PMC article.
-
Physical and mental health problems of Chinese front-line healthcare workers before, during and after the COVID-19 rescue mission: a qualitative study.BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e059879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059879. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36302581 Free PMC article.
-
A cross-sectional examination of the relationship between nurses' experiences of skin lesions and anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the mediating role of fear and resilience.J Nurs Manag. 2022 Sep;30(6):1903-1912. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13638. Epub 2022 Apr 29. J Nurs Manag. 2022. PMID: 35434883 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with mask-induced dermatosis and its impact on patients' quality of life.Dermatol Reports. 2023 May 23;15(3):9694. doi: 10.4081/dr.2023.9694. eCollection 2023 Sep 12. Dermatol Reports. 2023. PMID: 37822983 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical