Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;62(8):e436-e441.
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001933.

Increased Spinal Cord Stimulator Use and Continued Opioid Treatment Among Injured Workers: A Regional Pilot Study

Nina Leung  1 , Nicholas F Tsourmas, Larry Yuspeh, Nimisha Kalia, Robert A Lavin, Xuguang Grant Tao, Edward J Bernacki
Affiliations

Increased Spinal Cord Stimulator Use and Continued Opioid Treatment Among Injured Workers: A Regional Pilot Study

Nina Leung et al. J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the rate, characteristics, and costs of Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) placements among claimants at a Texas-based workers' compensation carrier.

Methods: Indemnity claims occurring between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018 were assessed longitudinally.

Results: While there was annual variability in rates of SCS placement, the rate of SCS placement increased from 0.21 to 1.56 per 1000 serviced claims. The average total paid claim cost of a trial and permanent placement was $141,288 and $197,813, respectively. Chronic opioid use (more than 3 months) following trial (73.0%) and permanent placement (63.8%) occurred frequently. Time between injury and trial placement decreased (2008 to 2010 = 3.1 years vs 2015 to 2018 = 2.5 years, P < 0.0001) over the study period.

Conclusions: The rate of SCS placements significantly increased and duration between injury to placement decreased over time. Claimants undergoing SCS placement frequently continued to use opioids, indicating limited success in pain modulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fishman MA, Antony A, Esposito M, et al. The evolution of neuromodulation in the treatment of chronic pain: forward-looking perspectives. Pain Med 2019; 20: (suppl): S58–S68.
    1. Bates D, Schultheis BC, Hanes MC, et al. A Comprehensive algorithm for management of neuropathic pain. Pain Med 2019; 20: (suppl): S2–S12.
    1. Thomson SJ, Tavakkolizadeh M, Love-Jones S, et al. Effects of rate on analgesia in Kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the PROCO randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation 2018; 21:67–76.
    1. Schultz DM, Webster L, Kosek P, et al. Sensor-driven position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain. Pain Physician 2012; 15:1–12.
    1. Schu S, Slotty PJ, Bara G, et al. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 2014; 17:443–450.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources