Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar:94 Suppl 1:8-35.
doi: 10.1111/papt.12286. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

The acceptability, effectiveness, and durability of cognitive analytic therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Craig Hallam  1 , Melanie Simmonds-Buckley  2 , Stephen Kellett  2   3 , Beth Greenhill  1   4 , Andrew Jones  1
Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

The acceptability, effectiveness, and durability of cognitive analytic therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Craig Hallam et al. Psychol Psychother. 2021 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: This paper sought to conduct a meta-analysis of the effectiveness and durability of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) and assess the acceptability of CAT in terms of dropout rates.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: PROSPERO registration: CRD42018086009. Searches identified CAT treatment outcome studies eligible to be narratively synthesized. Pre-post/post-follow-up effect sizes (ESs) were extracted and synthesized in a random-effects meta-analysis. Variations in effect sizes were explored using moderator analyses. Dropout rates were extracted. Secondary analyses synthesized between-group ES from trials of CAT.

Results: Twenty-five studies providing pre-post CAT treatment outcomes were aggregated across three outcome comparisons of functioning, depression, and interpersonal problems. CAT produced large pre-post improvements in global functioning (ES = 0.86; 95% CI 0.71-1.01, N = 628), moderate-to-large improvements in interpersonal problems (ES = 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-0.97, N = 460), and large reductions in depression symptoms (ES = 1.05, 95% CI 0.80-1.29, N = 586). All these effects were maintained or improved upon at follow-up. Limited moderators of CAT treatment effect were identified. CAT demonstrated small-moderate, significant post-treatment benefits compared to comparators in nine clinical trials (ES = 0.36-0.53; N = 352). The average dropout rate for CAT was 16% (range 0-33%).

Conclusions: Patients with a range of presenting problems appear to experience durable improvements in their difficulties after undergoing CAT. Recommendations are provided to guide the further progression of the CAT outcome evidence base.

Practitioner points: Large pre-post reductions in global functioning and depression outcomes and moderate-large reductions in interpersonal problems are evident after CAT. The effects of CAT appear durable, and interpersonal functioning significantly improves over follow-up time. CAT produces small-moderate benefits compared to trial comparators. CAT appears to be an engaging psychotherapy that maintains patients in treatment.

Keywords: cognitive analytic therapy; effectiveness; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Altman, D. G. (1994). The scandal of poor medical research. British Medical Journal, 308, 283. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283
    1. *Ameri, M. A., Yousefi, A., Rad, S. A., & Khorshidi, F. R. (2017). The effectiveness of cognitive analytic therapy on the severity of symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7, 212-216. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.3.868
    1. Balk, E. M., Earley, A., Patel, K., Trikalinos, T. A., & Dahabreh, I. J. (2012). Empirical assessment of within-arm correlation imputation in trials of continuous outcomes. Methods Research Report AHRQ Publication No. 12 (13)-EHC141-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23326900
    1. Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., Marshall, C., & Twigg, E. (2005). Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 239-46. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.3.239
    1. Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Lambert, M. J., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2010). Building a rigorous and relevant knowledge base for the psychological therapies. In M. Barkham, G. E. Hardy & J. Mellor-Clark (Eds.), Developing and delivering practice-based evidence: A guide for the psychological therapies (pp. 21-61). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470687994.ch2