Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jun;27(3):10213-10219.

Early patient experience following treatment with the UroLift prostatic urethral lift and Rezum steam injection

Affiliations
  • PMID: 32544043
Free article
Comparative Study

Early patient experience following treatment with the UroLift prostatic urethral lift and Rezum steam injection

Ronald F Tutrone et al. Can J Urol. 2020 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: To report the early postoperative patient experience, including symptom response, catheterization, recovery and satisfaction, following treatment with two minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): mechanical disobstruction with UroLift prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and tissue ablation with steam injection (Rezum).

Materials and methods: Patient reported outcomes of 53 non-retention patients from two U.S. sites patients who underwent PUL (n = 30) or Rezum (n = 23) were collected within 2 months post-treatment. There were no exclusion criteria for baseline symptoms, prostate size, or BPH medical therapy. Patients completed questionnaires which assessed postoperative BPH symptoms and characteristics. Outcomes were compared between treatment arms with unpaired t-tests and Fisher's exact tests.

Results: PUL and Rezum patients were similar in age and prostate volume; patients completed the questionnaire an average of 30 ± 11 days post-treatment. Absolute mean International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life was significantly better for PUL patients. Seven percent of PUL patients were catheterized by postoperative day 3 compared to 55% of Rezum patients (p = 0.0003). PUL patients experienced a rate of 83% treatment satisfaction (versus 65% for Rezum, p = 0.2) and less interference with daily activities (sports interference, p = 0.007; entertainment interference, p = 0.01; community interference, p = 0.04). Both groups reported BPH medication use following treatment (37% PUL versus 91% Rezum), albeit significantly higher for Rezum (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Preliminary data suggests UroLift PUL provides a superior patient experience with better sexual function, lower catheterization rates, less daily interference, and higher patient satisfaction in the recovery period compared to Rezum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Letter to the Editor.
    Arezki A, Sadri I, Zakaria AS, Nguyen DD, Bhojani N, Elterman D, Chughtai B, Zorn KC. Arezki A, et al. Can J Urol. 2021 Feb;28(1):10506-10507. Can J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33625338 No abstract available.
  • Reply Letter By Author.
    Tutrone RF, Schiff W. Tutrone RF, et al. Can J Urol. 2021 Feb;28(1):10508-10509. Can J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33625339 No abstract available.
  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
    Kaplan SA. Kaplan SA. J Urol. 2021 Dec;206(6):1490-1493. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002218. Epub 2021 Sep 9. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 34496607 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources