Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 11;20(11):3322.
doi: 10.3390/s20113322.

Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Methodologies for Lower-Body Kinematic Analysis with Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Sensor-to-Segment Calibration Methodologies for Lower-Body Kinematic Analysis with Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review

Léonie Pacher et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Kinematic analysis is indispensable to understanding and characterizing human locomotion. Thanks to the development of inertial sensors based on microelectronics systems, human kinematic analysis in an ecological environment is made possible. An important issue in human kinematic analyses with inertial sensors is the necessity of defining the orientation of the inertial sensor coordinate system relative to its underlying segment coordinate system, which is referred to sensor-to-segment calibration. Over the last decade, we have seen an increase of proposals for this purpose. The aim of this review is to highlight the different proposals made for lower-body segments. Three different databases were screened: PubMed, Science Direct and IEEE Xplore. One reviewer performed the selection of the different studies and data extraction. Fifty-five studies were included. Four different types of calibration method could be identified in the articles: the manual, static, functional, and anatomical methods. The mathematical approach to obtain the segment axis and the calibration evaluation were extracted from the selected articles. Given the number of propositions and the diversity of references used to evaluate the methods, it is difficult today to form a conclusion about the most suitable. To conclude, comparative studies are required to validate calibration methods in different circumstances.

Keywords: calibration; human movement; inertial measurement unit; lower-body kinematics; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of search strategy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker R. Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2006;3:4. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertucci W.M., Betik A.C., Duc S., Grappe F. Gross Efficiency and Cycling Economy Are Higher in the Field as Compared with on an Axiom Stationary Ergometer. J. Appl. Biomech. 2012;28:636–644. doi: 10.1123/jab.28.6.636. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galperin I., Hillel I., Del Din S., Bekkers E.M.J., Nieuwboer A., Abbruzzese G., Avanzino L., Nieuwhof F., Bloem B.R., Rochester L., et al. Associations between daily-living physical activity and laboratory-based assessments of motor severity in patients with falls and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2019;62:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamburini P., Storm F., Buckley C., Bisi M.C., Stagni R., Mazzà C. Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait. Gait Posture. 2018;59:248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu G., Cavanagh P.R. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J. Biomech. 1995;28:1257–1261. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00017-C. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources