Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):561.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06923-0.

Black patients referred to a lung cancer screening program experience lower rates of screening and longer time to follow-up

Michael Lake  1 , Christine S Shusted  2 , Hee-Soon Juon  3 , Russell K McIntire  4 , Charnita Zeigler-Johnson  3 , Nathaniel R Evans  5 , Gregory C Kane  2 , Julie A Barta  6
Affiliations

Black patients referred to a lung cancer screening program experience lower rates of screening and longer time to follow-up

Michael Lake et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Racial disparities are well-documented in preventive cancer care, but they have not been fully explored in the context of lung cancer screening. We sought to explore racial differences in lung cancer screening outcomes within a lung cancer screening program (LCSP) at our urban academic medical center including differences in baseline low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) results, time to follow-up, adherence, as well as return to annual screening after additional imaging, loss to follow-up, and cancer diagnoses in patients with positive baseline scans.

Methods: A historical cohort study of patients referred to our LCSP was conducted to extract demographic and clinical characteristics, smoking history, and lung cancer screening outcomes.

Results: After referral to the LCSP, blacks had significantly lower odds of receiving LDCT compared to whites, even while controlling for individual lung cancer risk factors and neighborhood-level factors. Blacks also demonstrated a trend toward delayed follow-up, decreased adherence, and loss to follow-up across all Lung-RADS categories.

Conclusions: Overall, lung cancer screening annual adherence rates were low, regardless of race, highlighting the need for increased patient education and outreach. Furthermore, the disparities in race we identified encourage further research with the purpose of creating culturally competent and inclusive LCSPs.

Keywords: Cancer Screening; Lung Cancer; Lung Cancer Screening; Lung Cancer diagnosis; Racial disparities; Screening adherence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT Diagram Displaying Sample Population
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jemal A, Fedewa SA. Lung Cancer Screening with low-dose computed tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015. JAMA oncology. 2017;3(9):1278–1281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What Are the Risk Factors for Lung Cancer? Atlanta, GA: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018 [updated July 19th, 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/lung/basic_info/risk_factors.htm.
    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research T, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Force USPST. USPSTF Final Recommendation Statement: Lung Cancer Screening 2013 [Available from: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/Recommendati....
    1. Services CfMaM. Decision Memo for Screening for Lung Cancer with Low-Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439N) 2015 [Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo... NCAId=274.

MeSH terms