Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun;5(6):e002502.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002502.

An analysis of International Health Regulations Emergency Committees and Public Health Emergency of International Concern Designations

Affiliations
Review

An analysis of International Health Regulations Emergency Committees and Public Health Emergency of International Concern Designations

Lucia Mullen et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Nine events have been assessed for potential declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). A PHEIC is defined as an extraordinary event that constitutes a public health risk to other states through international spread and requires a coordinated international response. The WHO Director-General convenes Emergency Committees (ECs) to provide their advice on whether an event constitutes a PHEIC. The EC rationales have been criticised for being non-transparent and contradictory to the International Health Regulations (IHR). This first comprehensive analysis of EC rationale provides recommendations to increase clarity of EC decisions which will strengthen the IHR and WHO's legitimacy in future outbreaks.

Methods: 66 EC statements were reviewed from nine public health outbreaks of influenza A, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, polio, Ebola virus disease, Zika, yellow fever and coronavirus disease-2019. Statements were analysed to determine which of the three IHR criteria were noted as contributing towards the EC's justification on whether to declare a PHEIC and what language was used to explain the decision.

Results: Interpretation of the criteria were often vague and applied inconsistently. ECs often failed to describe and justify which criteria had been satisfied.

Discussion: Guidelines must be developed for the standardised interpretation of IHR core criteria. The ECs must clearly identify and justify which criteria have contributed to their rationale for or against PHEIC declaration.

Conclusion: Striving for more consistency and transparency in EC justifications would benefit future deliberations and provide more understanding and support for the process.

Keywords: health policy; public health; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outlines which criteria and thematic factors were explicitly stated or implied as contributing to the Emergency Committee recommendation to the WHO Director-General. COVID-19, coronavirus disease-2019; EVD, Ebola virus disease; H1N1, influenza A; MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome; PHEIC, Public Health Emergency of International Concern.

References

    1. World Health Organization International health regulations. 3 edn World Health Organization, 2016.
    1. Gostin LO, Tomori O, Wibulpolprasert S, et al. Toward a common secure future: four global commissions in the wake of Ebola. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002042. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization International health regulations committees and expert roster. Available: http://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/ihr_committees/en/
    1. World Health Organization Statement on the meeting of the international health regulations (2005) emergency committee for Ebola virus disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo on 12 February 2020. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/12-02-2020-statement-on-the-meeting...
    1. Joseph A. WHO declares coronavirus outbreak a global health emergency. STAT, 2020.

Publication types