The Impact of Advanced Age on Major Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy
- PMID: 32546989
- PMCID: PMC7247595
- DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S218827
The Impact of Advanced Age on Major Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy
Abstract
Background: There is little research in the efficacy and safety of a pharmaco-invasive strategy (PIS) in patients ≥75 years versus <75 years of age. We aimed to evaluate and compare the influence of advanced age on the risk of death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing PIS.
Methods: Between January 2010 and November 2016, 14 municipal emergency rooms in São Paulo, Brazil, used full-dose tenecteplase to treat patients with STEMI as part of a pharmaco-invasive strategy for a local network implementation.
Results: A total of 1852 patients undergoing PIS were evaluated, of which 160 (9%) were ≥75 years of age. Compared to patients <75 years, those ≥75 years were more often female, had lower body mass index, higher rates of hypertension; higher incidence of hypothyroidism, chronic renal failure, prior stroke, and diabetes. Compared to patients <75 years of age, in-hospital MACE and mortality were higher in patients with ≥75 years (6.5% versus 19.4%; p<0.001; and 4.0% versus 18.2%; p<0.001, respectively). Patients ≥75 years had higher rates of in-hospital major bleeding (2.7% versus 5.6%; p=0.04) and higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (7.0% versus 19.6%; p<0.001). By multivariable analysis, age ≥75 years was independent predictor of MACE (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.72 to 7.42, p=0.001) and death (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.12-3.82, p=0.020).
Conclusion: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PIS, age ≥75 years was an independent factor that entailed a 3.5-fold higher MACE and 2-fold higher mortality rate compared to patients <75 years of age.
Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; elderly; fibrinolysis; pharmaco-invasive strategy; primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2020 Helber et al.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation. Francisco AH Fonseca reports grants from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Amgen, Novo Nordisk, Takeda, Sanofi Aventis, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Tenecteplase in Patients With STEMI: Prespecified Pooled Analysis of Patients Aged ≥75 Years in STREAM-1 and 2.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec;17(12):e014251. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014251. Epub 2024 Dec 17. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 39689189 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Alteplase Versus Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: EARLY-MYO Trial (Early Routine Catheterization After Alteplase Fibrinolysis Versus Primary PCI in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction).Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):1462-1473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030582. Epub 2017 Aug 27. Circulation. 2017. PMID: 28844990 Clinical Trial.
-
Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing to pharmaco-invasive strategy.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jan;34:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.01.027. Epub 2021 Jan 29. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022. PMID: 33736961
-
Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 2;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0812-6. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018. PMID: 29716535 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Culprit Vessel-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Collaborative Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005582. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005582. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017. PMID: 29146672 Review.
Cited by
-
Reperfusion Strategy of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Pharmaco-Invasive Therapy.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 17;9:813325. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.813325. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35369319 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Inflammation in Cardiac Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction.Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 28;13:927163. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.927163. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35837017 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy in Elderly Up to 75 Years or Non-Elderly: Analysis of Biochemical and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 9;120(1):e20220177. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220177. eCollection 2023. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36629600 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese.
-
Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2021.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022 Jan;118(1):115-373. doi: 10.36660/abc.20211012. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35195219 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
-
Predictive modeling for acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a machine learning approach.Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 24;29(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01675-0. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 38268045 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(2):119–177. - PubMed
-
- Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;115(19):2570–2589. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182616 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources