Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 29:11:700.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00700. eCollection 2020.

Impact of Chemical and Alternative Fungicides Applied to Grapevine cv Nebbiolo on Microbial Ecology and Chemical-Physical Grape Characteristics at Harvest

Affiliations

Impact of Chemical and Alternative Fungicides Applied to Grapevine cv Nebbiolo on Microbial Ecology and Chemical-Physical Grape Characteristics at Harvest

Kalliopi Rantsiou et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Viticulture is a cropping system in which treatment against fungal diseases (in particular powdery and downy mildews) can be extremely frequent. Accordingly, a reduction in antimicrobial treatments and the application of environmentally-friendly compounds are becoming increasingly important for a more sustainable viticulture. In addition to their effect against pathogens, the impact of these products on the quality of the grapes is very important for the oenological industries, but unfortunately at present few data are available. We evaluated the effect of the application of biocontrol products and resistance inducers in the vineyard on the mechanical properties, microbial ecology, technological and phenolic maturity of Vitis vinifera "Nebbiolo" grapes at harvest. The yield and vigor of vines were not influenced by the treatments, nor were the production of primary and secondary metabolites. However, the active ingredients influenced the mechanical properties of the skin (hardness and thickness). A significant hardening of the skin was detected when laminarin and chito-oligosaccharides were used, and sulfur induced a thickening of the skin with potential consequences for wine quality. Furthermore, the yeast community present on grape berries was influenced by the treatments. The abundance of Aureobasidium pullulans, the dominant species on the grape berry, changed in response to the compounds used. In addition, Alternaria sp. was reduced in some treatments with a potentially positive effect on the quality and the safety of the grapes. This study provides an overview of the effect of biocontrol products and resistance inducers on microbial ecology and "Nebbiolo" grape quality, contributing to the establishment of more sustainable and effective defense strategies in viticulture.

Keywords: antifungal compounds; grapevine berries; harvest; microbial ecology; powdery and downy mildews; texture analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Efficacy of the treatments against Erysiphe necator on the incidence and severity on grape clusters, compared to non-treated control (CTR) and standard treatments for conventional (S+Met) and organic (S) farms in the region. Different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05). Treatment descriptions are reported in Table 1.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Fungal load, as determined by microbiological analysis on WLN medium, expressed in Log10 CFU/mL. The bars represent mean values and standard deviation from four replicates for each treatment. Different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05) (A). Fungal species biodiversity: for each treatment, the frequency of isolation of the four species detected is expressed as a percentage. Isolates grown on WLN medium were grouped based on colony morphology and representatives of each colony type were identified to species level by molecular methods (B). Treatment descriptions are reported in Table 1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Boxplots to describe α-diversity measures of grape mycobiota. Individual points and brackets represent the richness estimate and the theoretical standard error range, respectively. Treatment descriptions are reported in Table 1.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Boxplots showing the relative abundance at species or genus level of the OTUs, differentially abundant based on Wilcoxon matched pairs test, in grape samples. Treatment descriptions are reported in Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agarbati A., Canonico L., Ciani M., Comitini F. (2019). The impact of fungicide treatments on yeast biota of Verdicchio and Montepulciano grape varieties. PLoS One 14:e0217385. 10.1371/journal.pone.0217385 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alessandria V., Marengo F., Englezos V., Gerbi V., Rantsiou K., Cocolin L. (2015). Mycobiota of Barbera grapes from the Piedmont region from a single vintage year. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 66 244–250.
    1. Aziz A., Poinssot B., Daire X., Adrian M., Bézier A., Lambert B., et al. (2003). Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 16 1118–1128. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.12.1118 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aziz A., Trotel-Aziz P., Dhuicq L., Jeandet P., Couderchet M., Vernet G. (2006). Chitosan oligomers and copper sulfate induce grapevine defense reactions and resistance to gray mold and downy mildew. Phytopathology 96 1188–1194. 10.1094/PHYTO-96-1188 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barata A., Malfeito-Ferreira M., Loureiro V. (2012). The microbial ecology of wine grape berries. Int. J. Food Microb. 153 243–259. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.025 - DOI - PubMed