Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;15(11):e12662.
doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12662. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Associations of parents' use of food as reward with children's eating behaviour and BMI in a population-based cohort

Affiliations

Associations of parents' use of food as reward with children's eating behaviour and BMI in a population-based cohort

Pauline W Jansen et al. Pediatr Obes. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Parents' use of food as reward has been linked to children's dietary intake, but the association with children's eating behaviour and overweight risk is less clear.

Objectives: To examine the temporal association of using food as reward with eating behaviour, body mass index (BMI) and weight status of children.

Methods: Participants were 3642 children of the population-based Generation R Study in the Netherlands (8.3% overweight/obese). Repeated assessments were collected at child ages 4 and 9 years, including measured anthropometrics and parent reports on feeding practises and eating behaviour.

Results: Linear regressions and cross-lagged models indicated that parents' use of food as reward at child age 4 years predicted Emotional Overeating and Picky Eating at age 9 years. Reversely, higher Emotional Overeating and Food Responsiveness scores were associated with more use of food as reward over time. Using food as reward was not associated with children's satiety response, BMI or overweight risk.

Conclusions: A vicious cycle may appear in which children who display food approach behaviour are rewarded with food by their parents, which in turn might contribute to the development of unhealthy eating habits (emotional eating, fussiness). These findings warrant further research, to facilitate evidence-based recommendations for parents.

Keywords: BMI; eating behaviour; emotional eating; fussy; instrumental feeding; using food as reward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Cross‐lagged model of association between the use of food as reward with child Emotional Overeating. Values represent standardized linear regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals) and are adjusted for covariates. N = 3511, model fit: RMSEA = 0.022, CFI = 0.959 and TLI = 0.907. Wald test comparing lagged pathways: P = .016
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cross‐lagged model of association between the use of food as reward with child Food Responsiveness. Values represent standardized linear regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals) and are adjusted for covariates. N = 3624, model fit: RMSEA = 0.035, CFI = 0.923 and TLI = 0.826. Wald test comparing lagged pathways: P = .004
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Cross‐lagged model of association between the use of food as reward with child Satiety Responsiveness. Values represent standardized linear regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals) and are adjusted for covariates. N = 3616, model fit: RMSEA = 0.027, CFI = 0.966 and TLI = 0.923. Wald test comparing lagged pathways: P = .43
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Cross‐lagged model of association between the use of food as reward with child Food Fussiness/Picky Eating. Values represent standardized linear regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals) and are adjusted for covariates. N = 3620, model fit: RMSEA = 0.026, CFI = 0.970 and TLI = 0.932. Wald test comparing lagged pathways: P = .501
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Cross‐lagged model of association between the use of food as reward with child BMI. Values represent standardized linear regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals) and are adjusted for covariates. N = 3486, model fit: RMSEA = 0.144, CFI = 0.300 and TLI = 0.000. Wald test comparing lagged pathways: P = .771

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nguyen AN, Jen V, Jaddoe VWV, et al. Diet quality in early and mid‐childhood in relation to trajectories of growth and body composition. Clin Nutr. 2019;39(3):845‐852. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz C, Scholtens PA, Lalanne A, Weenen H, Nicklaus S. Development of healthy eating habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and selected guidelines. Appetite. 2011;57(3):796‐807. - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Patrick H, Hennessy E, McSpadden K, Oh A. Parenting styles and practises in children's obesogenic behaviour: scientific gaps and future research directions. Child Obes. 2013;9:S73‐S86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaughn AE, Tabak RG, Bryant MJ, Ward DS. Measuring parent food practises: a systematic review of existing measures and examination of instruments. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:61. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types