Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;54(1):92-99.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.049. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Indications, Findings, and Complications - Data from a Prospective German Colon Capsule Registry Trial (DEKOR)

Affiliations

Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Indications, Findings, and Complications - Data from a Prospective German Colon Capsule Registry Trial (DEKOR)

Johannes Hausmann et al. Clin Endosc. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: Reliable and especially widely accepted preventive measures are crucial to further reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) might increase the screening numbers among patients unable or unwilling to undergo conventional colonoscopy. This registry trial aimed to document and determine the CCE indications, findings, complications, and adverse events in outpatient practices and clinics throughout Germany.

Methods: Patients undergoing CCE between 2010 and 2015 were enrolled in this prospective multicenter registry trial at six German centers. Patient demographics, outcomes, and complications were evaluated.

Results: A total of 161 patients were included. Of the CCE evaluations, 111 (68.9%) were considered successful. Pathological findings in the colon (n=92, 60.1%) and in the remaining gastrointestinal tract (n=38, 24.8%) were recorded. The main finding was the presence of polyps (n=52, 32.3%). Furthermore, five carcinomas (3.1%) were detected and histologically confirmed later. Adequate bowel cleanliness was more likely to be achieved in the outpatient setting (p<0.0001). Interestingly, 85 patients (55.6%) chose to undergo CCE based on personal motivation.

Conclusion: CCE seems to be a reliable and safe endoscopic tool for screening for CRC and detecting other diseases. Its patient acceptance and feasibility seems to be high, especially in the outpatient setting.

Keywords: Colonic neoplasms; Control; Endoscopy; Prevention; Registries; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Johannes Hausmann, Andrea Tal, Michael Philipper, Horst Hohn, Jörg Albert receive lecturer fees from Covidien/Medtronic, all outside of the submitted work. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Overview of the pathological findings of colon capsule endoscopy. (A) Crohn’s disease of the jejunum. (B) Colon polyp. (C) Colon carcinoma. (D) Close-up view of colon carcinoma.

References

    1. Welch HG, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancer on the decline--why screening can’t explain it all. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1605–1607. - PubMed
    1. Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Altekruse SF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer. 2016;122:1312–1337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Hoff G. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD009259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. - PubMed
    1. Skinner CS, Gupta S, Halm EA, et al. Development of the Parkland-UT Southwestern colonoscopy reporting system (CoRS) for evidence-based colon cancer surveillance recommendations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:402–406. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources