Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan 13;54(4):426-443.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00022-4. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Sarvpreet Singh  1 , Shalin Shaunak  2 , Sebastian C K Shaw  3 , John L Anderson  4 , Vipul Mandalia  4
Affiliations
Review

Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Sarvpreet Singh et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common sports injury. Symptomatic knee instability after this injury is usually treated operatively through ACL reconstruction. The surgery involves a tendon graft being fixed in bony tunnels drilled through femur and tibia. The fixation of the graft is of critical importance to achieving good results. One of the commonest devices used to fix the graft in the femoral bony tunnel is a fixed loop cortical suspensory device. More recently, adjustable loop cortical suspension devices have been introduced, and have gained popularity for ACL reconstruction. These allow for adjusting the length of the suspension loop after insertion. There is currently much debate concerning whether the adjustable loop devices are superior or inferior to the fixed loop devices.

Purpose: To critique and review the current biomechanical and clinical evidence on the use of adjustable loop devices in hamstring ACL reconstruction. To our knowledge, there have been no previous reviews of this topic.

Study design: Systematic review.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA. Five databases were searched using multiple search terms and MeSH terms where possible. The following limits were applied: papers published in English and papers published in the last 21 years.

Results: Eleven laboratory and six clinical studies were reviewed. The laboratory-based studies have frequently shown elongation of adjustable loop devices to more than 3 mm under loading protocols, whereas the clinical studies have not shown any significant differences between the patients with fixed loop and the ones with adjustable loop devices.

Clinical significance: This review shows a discrepancy between laboratory-based and clinical studies. The review of clinical studies in our paper would give future researchers confidence and act as a prompt to construct randomised clinical trials to investigate these devices further.

Conclusion: We feel that more robust clinical randomised studies and trials are needed to evaluate these new devices.

Keywords: ACL reconstruction; Adjustable loop femoral cortical suspensory devices; Anterior cruciate ligament; Fixed loop femoral cortical suspensory devices; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA, Jr, Garrett WE. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000;23:573–578. - PubMed
    1. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Lattermann C, Ma CB. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999;27:821–830. - PubMed
    1. Fu FH, Bennett CH, Ma CB, Menetrey J, Lattermann C. Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000;28:124–130. - PubMed
    1. Kamien PM, Hydrick JM, Replogle WH, Go LT, Barrett GR. Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013;41:1808–1812. - PubMed
    1. Heijne A, Fleming BC, Renstrom PA, Peura GD, Beynnon BD, Werner S. Strain on the anterior cruciate ligament during closed kinetic chain exercises. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2004;36:935–941. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources