Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020 Jan;8(1):e27-e31.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695048. Epub 2020 Apr 28.

A Surgical Technique to Repair Perineal Body Disruption Secondary to Sexual Assault

Affiliations
Case Reports

A Surgical Technique to Repair Perineal Body Disruption Secondary to Sexual Assault

Giulia Brisighelli et al. European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Perineal trauma is uncommon in the pediatric population and it is estimated that 5 to 21% is secondary to sexual abuse. We aim to present a proposed surgical technique to repair perineal injuries secondary to sexual assault in female children. The technique is based on the posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for repairing anorectal malformations and, between 2017 and 2019, it was used to treat three girls (2 months, 2 years, and 8 years of age) with fourth-degree perineal injuries secondary to sexual assault. One of them underwent laparotomy and Hartmann's colostomy for an acute abdomen. Two underwent wound debridement and suturing and only had a stoma fashioned at 5 days and 6 weeks posttrauma, respectively. The perineal repair was performed 2, 6, and 7 weeks postinjury and done as follows: with the child prone in jack-knife position, stay-sutures are placed on the common wall between the rectum and the vagina. Using a needle tip diathermy, a transverse incision is performed below the sutures lifting the anterior rectal wall up. Stay sutures are then positioned on the posterior wall of the vaginal mucosa. The incision between the walls is deepened until the rectum and the vagina are completely separated. The deep and superficial perineal body is then reconstructed using absorbable sutures and an anterior anoplasty and an introitoplasty are performed. The stoma in each was closed 6 weeks postreconstruction. At follow-up, now 1 year or more postrepair, all patients have an excellent cosmetic outcome and are fully continent for stools.

Keywords: perineal injury; perineal reconstruction; perineal trauma; posterior sagittal anorectoplasty; sexual assault.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The three perineal injuries at examination under anesthesia (EUA) before the perineal repair was performed. ( A ) Case 1; ( B ) case 2; ( C ) case 3.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The three perineal injuries at EUA after the perineal repair was performed. ( A ) Case 1; ( B ) case 2; ( C ) case 3. EUA, examination under anesthesia.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
With the patient prone, a lone star retractor is positioned to facilitate exposure. The perineal reconstruction is then performed. ( A ) Stay sutures are positioned on the common wall between the rectum and the vagina. ( B ) Using a needle tip diathermy, an incision is made just below the stay sutures and the dissection begins to separate the anterior rectal wall from the posterior vagina.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
( A ) An additional line of stay sutures is then positioned on the vaginal mucosa. Exerting a countertraction on the two suture lines the dissection is continued to separate the rectum from the vagina. ( B ) The separation is only complete when an areolar plane has been reached between two structures.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
( A ) The perineal body is then reconstructed with interrupted absorbable sutures and the sphincter complex is reapproximated. ( B ) Reconstruction is completed with an anoplasty of the anterior rectal wall which is sutured to the reconstructed perineal body. The skin is then closed with interrupted absorbable sutures.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The two classifications used for perineal trauma. GIS, genital injury score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Onen A, Oztürk H, Yayla M, Basuguy E, Gedik S. Genital trauma in children: classification and management. Urology. 2005;65(05):986–990. - PubMed
    1. Janssen T L, van Dijk M, Al Malki I, van As A B. Management of physical child abuse in South Africa: literature review and children's hospital data analysis. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2013;33(04):216–227. - PubMed
    1. Scheidler M G, Schultz B L, Schall L, Ford H R. Mechanisms of blunt perineal injury in female pediatric patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(09):1317–1319. - PubMed
    1. Russell K W, Soukup E S, Metzger R R et al.Fecal continence following complex anorectal trauma in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(02):349–352. - PubMed
    1. Bakal U, Sarac M, Tartar T, Cigsar E B, Kazez A. Twenty years of experience with perineal injury in children. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(05):599–603. - PubMed

Publication types