Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 25:6:100029.
doi: 10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100029. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Optimization of the rat digit abduction score (DAS) assay: Evaluation of botulinum neurotoxin activity in the gastrocnemius lateralis, peronei, and extensor digitorum longus

Affiliations

Optimization of the rat digit abduction score (DAS) assay: Evaluation of botulinum neurotoxin activity in the gastrocnemius lateralis, peronei, and extensor digitorum longus

Sylvie Cornet et al. Toxicon X. .

Abstract

The mouse digit abduction score (DAS) assay is commonly used to measure muscle flaccidity-inducing effects of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) in vivo. Adapting the assay to rats has been challenging, as injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT-A) into the gastrocnemius muscle, as performed in mice, or into the tibialis anterior leads to sub-optimal sensitivity of the test (Broide et al., 2013). To optimize the experimental design of the rat DAS assay, we evaluated the effects of research-grade, purified, native BoNT serotype A1 (BoNT-A) in three muscles: the gastrocnemius lateralis, peronei, and extensor digitorum longus using female animals. Following injection, animals were tested daily for the digit abduction and body weight. BoNT-A caused dose-dependent inhibition of digit abduction when injected into the gastrocnemius lateralis or peronei. BoNT-A was six-fold more potent when injected into the peronei in comparison to the gastrocnemius lateralis. As injection of BoNT-A into the extensor digitorum longus muscle resulted in an all-or-none digit abduction response and therefore prevented calculation of the ED50, it was considered unsuitable for the rat DAS assay. At equipotent doses, peronei- and extensor digitorum longus-injected animals showed normal body weight gain, while those injected with BoNT-A into the gastrocnemius lateralis gained less weight in comparison to vehicle-treated controls. Thus, injecting the peronei muscles of female rats offers optimized conditions for evaluating the biological properties of BoNTs in the rat DAS assay; for assessing the potency, onset, and duration of action across natural and recombinant BoNT in a robust and reproducible manner.

Keywords: Botulinum neurotoxin type A; Digit abduction score; Extensor digitorum longus muscle; Gastrocnemius muscle; Peronei muscle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SC, CP, and MK are all employees of Ipsen Innovation, France.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BoNT-A dose-response in the mean peak digit abduction score (DAS) following injection into the peronei or gastrocnemius lateralis. The curves correspond to mean peak DAS responses observed 1 or 2 days post-administration. All values are means ± standard error of the mean from two independent experiments (n = 6–8 animals dose/experiment).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The time course of DAS following injection of BoNT-A at the closest dose to ED50 (diamond) and the first dose reaching DAS 4 (square) for the peronei and the gastrocnemius lateralis in comparison to that following injection of vehicle, gelatin phosphate buffer (GPB; circle) in either of the two muscles. All values are means ± standard error of the mean from two independent experiments (n = 6–8 dose/experiment).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of BoNT-A and vehicle (gelatin phosphate buffer; GPB) on body weight gain in the rat digit abduction score (DAS) assay. The effects were assessed at the half-maximal (DAS 2) and maximal (DAS 4) doses injected into the peronei muscles (A) or the gastrocnemius lateralis (B). All values are means ± standard error of the mean from two independent experiments with 6–8 animals per dose. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 significantly different from the GPB-injected control group by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post-hoc analysis.

References

    1. Adler M., Keller J., Sheridan R.E., Deshpande S.S. Persistence of botulinum neurotoxin A demonstrated by sequential administration of serotypes A and E in rat EDL muscle. Toxicon. 2001;39(2–3):233–243. - PubMed
    1. Aoki K.R. Preclinical update on BOTOX (botulinum toxin type A)-purified neurotoxin complex relative to other botulinum neurotoxin preparations. Eur. J. Neurol. 1999;6(Suppl. 4):S3–S10. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.1999.tb00032.x. - DOI
    1. Aoki K.R. A comparison of the safety margins of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A, B, and F in mice. Toxicon. 2001;39(12):1815–1820. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(01)00101-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aoki K.R. Pharmacology and immunology of botulinum toxin type A. Clin. Dermatol. 2003;21(6):476–480. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2003.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong R.B., Phelps R.O. Muscle fiber type composition of the rat hindlimb. Am. J. Anat. 1984;171(3):259–272. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001710303. - DOI - PubMed