Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 3:55:287-293.
doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.05.022. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Surgical patients' use of, and attitudes towards, the internet for e-patient activities in Germany and Oman

Affiliations

Surgical patients' use of, and attitudes towards, the internet for e-patient activities in Germany and Oman

Ken Masters et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). .

Abstract

Introduction: E-patient activities are known to impact upon the patient-doctor relationship and on surgical outcomes. In Oman, there is no published information about the e-patient. The aim of this study, conducted at two surgical sites, was to investigate surgical e-patients' use of, and attitudes towards, the Internet, and the possible impact on the delivery of healthcare.

Materials and methods: A convenience sample of 83 German and 93 Omani patients at the two surgical sites were given an in-house paper-based questionnaire, based on e-patient activities described in the literature. Descriptive statistics like means, standard deviations and frequencies were calculated.

Results: There were many similarities in usage and attitudes. Omani patients showed much greater knowledge and usage of sites and apps, used the Internet more for health-related activities (26.9% vs. 12.0%), and had a greater proportion of their physician encounters through email (10.0% vs. 4.0%) and social media (15.2% vs. 1.8%). More Omani patients brought information from the Internet than German patients (13.5% vs. 6.0%). Patients from both countries were generally positive about bringing material from the Internet to the consultation.

Discussion and conclusion: Both sites indicated typical e-patient activity and attitudes as described in the literature. Age and type of condition (chronic vs. acute) may explain the differences to some extent, but this was not consistent. Socio-cultural differences between the two countries may have a great influence on the usage.

Keywords: Communication; Surgeon-patient relationship; e-patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interests, financial or otherwise.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gates B. Viking; London: 1995. The Road Ahead.
    1. Ferguson T., e-Patient Scholars Working Group . 2007. E-patients: How They Can Help Us Heal Healthcare.
    1. Masters K., Ng’ambi D., Todd G. “I found it on the internet”: preparing for the e-patient in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2010;10:169–179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fox S., Duggan M. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project; Washington, DC: 2013. Health Online 2013.
    1. Eysenbach G. The Impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2003;53:356–371. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356. - DOI - PubMed